Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the brittleness of Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies by introducing CARE, a framework that learns recovery strategies directly from execution failures rather than relying on random perturbations. By combining stage-wise planning with physically grounded 3D monitoring, the system triggers atomic adjustments to maintain task progress even when encountering local deviations or structural anomalies. The approach demonstrates significant gains in real-world dual-arm tasks and introduces a new benchmark specifically for evaluating failure state recovery.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CARE: Experience-Guided Atomic Corrective Execution for Vision-Language-Action Policies

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.24118v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation but remain brittle once execution deviates from nominal trajectories. We propose CARE (Corrective Atomic Robotic Execution), a framework that improves recovery by learning from failures encountered during execution. Instead of generating corrective data from manually designed or random perturbations, CARE collects failed rollouts, models stage-conditioned post-failure deviations, and uses the resulting empirical distributions to synthesize representative failure states and corrective demonstrations. At inference time, CARE combines stage-wise planning with physically grounded 3D monitoring to trigger atomic adjustments or re-operations while preserving task progress. We further introduce the Failure State Recovery Benchmark (FSR-Bench), which evaluates recovery from intermediate failure states under local deviations and structural anomalies. Experiments across multiple VLA backbones, simulation benchmarks, and real-world dual-arm tasks show consistent improvements, with average task-success gains of 14.5 points in simulation and 15.9 points in the real world. Code, models, and data are available at https://github.com/xiaojunlan/care

Abstract:Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation but remain brittle once execution deviates from nominal trajectories. We propose CARE (Corrective Atomic Robotic Execution), a framework that improves recovery by learning from failures encountered during execution. Instead of generating corrective data from manually designed or random perturbations, CARE collects failed rollouts, models stage-conditioned post-failure deviations, and uses the resulting empirical distributions to synthesize representative failure states and corrective demonstrations. At inference time, CARE combines stage-wise planning with physically grounded 3D monitoring to trigger atomic adjustments or re-operations while preserving task progress. We further introduce the Failure State Recovery Benchmark (FSR-Bench), which evaluates recovery from intermediate failure states under local deviations and structural anomalies. Experiments across multiple VLA backbones, simulation benchmarks, and real-world dual-arm tasks show consistent improvements, with average task-success gains of 14.5 points in simulation and 15.9 points in the real world. Code, models, and data are available at this https URL

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.24118 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.24118v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24118 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage