aiqbench analysis
This research introduces CardioFusion-AI, a framework designed to robustly fuse ECG and PPG signals in wearable devices by dynamically adapting to signal degradation caused by motion or sensor dropout. The study demonstrates that while attention-based fusion minimizes overall heart rate error, distinct strategies are required to handle complete modality loss versus partial corruption, offering critical insights for developing reliable multimodal health monitoring systems.
CardioFusion-AI: Robust ECG--PPG Fusion for Multimodal Physiological Monitoring Under Signal Degradation
arXiv:2608.26000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensors are complementary but individually fragile: motion artifact, poor contact, and sensor dropout can degrade one or both signals. Fusion strategies that assume both modalities are equally trustworthy can become less reliable than a single clean modality under degradation. We present CardioFusion-AI, a framework whose signal-processing front end, including R-peak and systolic-peak detection, an Orphanidou-type signal-quality index, and beat-by-beat pulse transit time estimation, is validated on 53 real intensive-care recordings (848 windows; heart-rate mean absolute error 1.61 bpm for ECG and 2.78 bpm for PPG) and a real annotated fetal ECG database (R-peak F1 0.89-0.98). We then conduct a controlled synthetic degradation study comparing eight ECG-PPG fusion strategies across six degradation regimes spanning graded corruption and complete modality loss, using five independent training seeds. Attention fusion achieved the lowest descriptive overall error (1.66+/-0.43 bpm). Both adaptive gates reallocated weight toward the healthy modality under complete modality loss, but showed near-zero correlation between gate weight and signal quality under graded degradation (r = 0.10-0.24). Signal-quality conditioning produced a specific improvement under missing-PPG conditions (1.56+/-0.59 bpm), approaching the 1.48 bpm unimodal ceiling. With only five training seeds, no pairwise comparison survives Holm-corrected significance testing; effect sizes and confidence intervals are therefore reported. These results indicate that modality availability and modality quality are functionally distinct problems for adaptive fusion.
Abstract:Wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) sensors are complementary but individually fragile: motion artifact, poor contact, and sensor dropout can degrade one or both signals. Fusion strategies that assume both modalities are equally trustworthy can become less reliable than a single clean modality under degradation. We present CardioFusion-AI, a framework whose signal-processing front end, including R-peak and systolic-peak detection, an Orphanidou-type signal-quality index, and beat-by-beat pulse transit time estimation, is validated on 53 real intensive-care recordings (848 windows; heart-rate mean absolute error 1.61 bpm for ECG and 2.78 bpm for PPG) and a real annotated fetal ECG database (R-peak F1 0.89-0.98). We then conduct a controlled synthetic degradation study comparing eight ECG-PPG fusion strategies across six degradation regimes spanning graded corruption and complete modality loss, using five independent training seeds. Attention fusion achieved the lowest descriptive overall error (1.66+/-0.43 bpm). Both adaptive gates reallocated weight toward the healthy modality under complete modality loss, but showed near-zero correlation between gate weight and signal quality under graded degradation (r = 0.10-0.24). Signal-quality conditioning produced a specific improvement under missing-PPG conditions (1.56+/-0.59 bpm), approaching the 1.48 bpm unimodal ceiling. With only five training seeds, no pairwise comparison survives Holm-corrected significance testing; effect sizes and confidence intervals are therefore reported. These results indicate that modality availability and modality quality are functionally distinct problems for adaptive fusion.
7 pages, 4 figures. Under review at IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics. Code: this https URL
Signal Processing (eess.SP); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
arXiv:2608.26000 [eess.SP]
(or arXiv:2608.26000v1 [eess.SP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26000 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage
Deep Temporal Modeling and Ensemble Fusion for Multimodal Emotion Recognition from Physiological Signals
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
RAMamba-Net: A Reliability-Aware and Mamba-Based Multimodal Fusion Network for Auditory Attention Detection
arXiv · Sep 12, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
Does the Heart Show Your Pain? Tackling the X-ITE Pain Challenge with Self-Supervised ECG Representation Learning
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026