aiqbench analysis
This research introduces CAPTURE, a framework designed to help personalized LLM agents distinguish between genuine user preference changes and adversarial memory poisoning attacks. By employing neural differential equations and counterfactual auditing, the system significantly improves robustness against fixed-policy attacks while maintaining high acceptance rates for legitimate updates. The study highlights a critical security trade-off where adaptive attackers can still achieve moderate success rates if model weights are exposed, underscoring the need for explicit modeling of preference authenticity in memory-augmented systems.
CAPTURE: Disentangling Preference Drift from Memory Poisoning in Personalized LLM Agents
arXiv:2609.02265v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalized language agents use persistent memory to adapt to users over time, but the same mechanism creates an attack surface. When new information conflicts with stored preferences, an agent must distinguish genuine preference drift from temporary context shifts, ambiguity, or adversarial memory poisoning. We formulate this problem as a continuous-time partially observable decision process over a latent user state and show why rules based only on recency and provenance are insufficient. CAPTURE addresses this ambiguity with a neural differential-equation belief tracker, a multi-timescale memory ledger, uncertainty-triggered clarification, and counterfactual auditing of cited memories. On 480 held-out episodes from 96 users, CAPTURE achieves a 71.5% win rate, compared with 69.3% for an identically supervised baseline and 66.1% for the strongest heuristic baseline. It limits fixed-policy poisoning success to 11.5% while accepting 83.5% of genuine preference updates. Under an adaptive attacker with access to the released weights, attack success rises to 24.7%, exposing a real adaptation-security tradeoff. We further evaluate the frozen system zero-shot on an independently constructed benchmark and replay longitudinal interaction histories from 40 users collected over two to three weeks. These results suggest that modeling preference authenticity explicitly can improve both personalization and robustness in memory-augmented LLM agents.
Abstract:Personalized language agents use persistent memory to adapt to users over time, but the same mechanism creates an attack surface. When new information conflicts with stored preferences, an agent must distinguish genuine preference drift from temporary context shifts, ambiguity, or adversarial memory poisoning. We formulate this problem as a continuous-time partially observable decision process over a latent user state and show why rules based only on recency and provenance are insufficient. CAPTURE addresses this ambiguity with a neural differential-equation belief tracker, a multi-timescale memory ledger, uncertainty-triggered clarification, and counterfactual auditing of cited memories. On 480 held-out episodes from 96 users, CAPTURE achieves a 71.5% win rate, compared with 69.3% for an identically supervised baseline and 66.1% for the strongest heuristic baseline. It limits fixed-policy poisoning success to 11.5% while accepting 83.5% of genuine preference updates. Under an adaptive attacker with access to the released weights, attack success rises to 24.7%, exposing a real adaptation-security tradeoff. We further evaluate the frozen system zero-shot on an independently constructed benchmark and replay longitudinal interaction histories from 40 users collected over two to three weeks. These results suggest that modeling preference authenticity explicitly can improve both personalization and robustness in memory-augmented LLM agents.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.02265 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.02265v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02265 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words
Related coverage

The payload: the semantic layer, memory, and the loop that fills it
Neo4j · Aug 10, 2026
Disentangling Long-Term Memory via Latent Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning
arXiv · Sep 17, 2026
Celene's thoughts on consciousness
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026