Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This study evaluates the feasibility of using zero-shot GPT-4o-mini for predicting child stunting in low-resource settings, demonstrating performance comparable to traditional random forest models while offering higher sensitivity. However, significant fairness disparities across residence and wealth categories highlight critical risks before deploying foundation models in public health applications without further mitigation. The research underscores the necessity of rigorous temporal robustness testing and bias auditing when applying large language models to sensitive demographic data.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Can Zero-Shot LLMs Predict Child Malnutrition? A Fairness and Temporal Robustness Study

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.29082v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Child malnutrition remains a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in South Asia, where early identification of vulnerable children is critical for timely intervention and resource allocation. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, fairness, and temporal robustness of using a pretrained large language model (LLM) in a zero-shot setting for child stunting prediction using population health survey data. Using Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) data collected between 2007 and 2022, we transformed maternal, child, healthcare, and household characteristics into semantically interpretable prompt-based representations and evaluated GPT-4o-mini for zero-shot stunting prediction, comparing its performance against a random forest baseline and assessing fairness across demographic and socioeconomic groups as well as temporal robustness across survey waves. The results demonstrate that zero-shot inference using GPT-4o-mini achieved comparable balanced accuracy to the supervised baseline while exhibiting substantially higher sensitivity for identifying stunting cases, relatively consistent performance across child sex groups, and stable predictive behaviour across BDHS waves; however, important fairness disparities were observed across residence and household wealth categories, highlighting the need for further investigation before deployment of foundation models in public health prediction settings.

Title:Can Zero-Shot LLMs Predict Child Malnutrition? A Fairness and Temporal Robustness Study

Abstract:Child malnutrition remains a major public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in South Asia, where early identification of vulnerable children is critical for timely intervention and resource allocation. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, fairness, and temporal robustness of using a pretrained large language model (LLM) in a zero-shot setting for child stunting prediction using population health survey data. Using Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) data collected between 2007 and 2022, we transformed maternal, child, healthcare, and household characteristics into semantically interpretable prompt-based representations and evaluated GPT-4o-mini for zero-shot stunting prediction, comparing its performance against a random forest baseline and assessing fairness across demographic and socioeconomic groups as well as temporal robustness across survey waves. The results demonstrate that zero-shot inference using GPT-4o-mini achieved comparable balanced accuracy to the supervised baseline while exhibiting substantially higher sensitivity for identifying stunting cases, relatively consistent performance across child sex groups, and stable predictive behaviour across BDHS waves; however, important fairness disparities were observed across residence and household wealth categories, highlighting the need for further investigation before deployment of foundation models in public health prediction settings.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2607.29082 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.29082v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29082 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 294 words

Related coverage