aiqbench analysis
This research evaluates the reliability of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in quantifying specific sidewalk attributes like width and slope for accessibility compliance using conformal prediction. While effective width estimates show promise, the study reveals that current models lack the precision required for regulatory thresholds on other metrics such as cross-slope and pavement condition without extensive calibration against field data. The findings highlight a critical gap between self-consistent model responses and actual measurement accuracy, emphasizing the need for ground-truth calibration before deploying VLMs for urban accessibility screening.
Can VLMs Reliably Assess Sidewalk Accessibility Attributes from Pedestrian-Level Imagery?
arXiv:2609.17882v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: An important component of urban accessibility, particularly for wheelchair users and people with reduced mobility, is sidewalk compliance with measurable requirements. We test whether effective width, longitudinal slope, cross slope, and pavement condition can be assessed reliably from pedestrian-level imagery using vision-language models (VLMs). We present the first application of sampling-based conformal prediction (CP) for VLM-based accessibility assessment. We evaluate four VLMs on 514 sidewalk images from Seoul, South Korea, with field-measured ground truth. Conformal calibration attains the nominal 90% coverage for all models and attributes, but the calibrated regions differ in informativeness. Effective width yields the most informative estimates, with a mean interval half-width of about 1.0 m for the best model. Since every model overestimates width, asymmetric calibration shortens the intervals by up to 33% at unchanged coverage. Longitudinal slope is marginally informative, cross-slope intervals are too wide to resolve regulatory thresholds, and pavement-condition sets degenerate to all five grades (A-E) for three of the four models. Uncalibrated intervals from raw sampling dispersion cover only 17-47% of field-measured values at a nominal 90% level. Among the images with the most self-consistent responses, these intervals miss the field-measured value in up to 96% of cases. Response self-consistency is therefore not evidence of accuracy, and sampling dispersion cannot be interpreted as uncertainty until it has been calibrated against field-measured ground truth. No quantitative attribute reaches the precision required for general compliance assessment, but CP identifies from calibration data alone which attributes can support screening of segments far from the thresholds. We release the annotated pedestrian-level images and their corresponding field-measured attribute values.
Title:Can VLMs Reliably Assess Sidewalk Accessibility Attributes from Pedestrian-Level Imagery?
Abstract:An important component of urban accessibility, particularly for wheelchair users and people with reduced mobility, is sidewalk compliance with measurable requirements. We test whether effective width, longitudinal slope, cross slope, and pavement condition can be assessed reliably from pedestrian-level imagery using vision-language models (VLMs). We present the first application of sampling-based conformal prediction (CP) for VLM-based accessibility assessment. We evaluate four VLMs on 514 sidewalk images from Seoul, South Korea, with field-measured ground truth. Conformal calibration attains the nominal 90% coverage for all models and attributes, but the calibrated regions differ in informativeness. Effective width yields the most informative estimates, with a mean interval half-width of about 1.0 m for the best model. Since every model overestimates width, asymmetric calibration shortens the intervals by up to 33% at unchanged coverage. Longitudinal slope is marginally informative, cross-slope intervals are too wide to resolve regulatory thresholds, and pavement-condition sets degenerate to all five grades (A-E) for three of the four models. Uncalibrated intervals from raw sampling dispersion cover only 17-47% of field-measured values at a nominal 90% level. Among the images with the most self-consistent responses, these intervals miss the field-measured value in up to 96% of cases. Response self-consistency is therefore not evidence of accuracy, and sampling dispersion cannot be interpreted as uncertainty until it has been calibrated against field-measured ground truth. No quantitative attribute reaches the precision required for general compliance assessment, but CP identifies from calibration data alone which attributes can support screening of segments far from the thresholds. We release the annotated pedestrian-level images and their corresponding field-measured attribute values.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.17882 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.17882v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17882 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 376 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

How an assessor could investigate alignment of unreleased AI models
METR · Oct 14, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026