aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that open-source Vision-Language Models can effectively assist in semi-automated Olympic diving scoring by leveraging semantic reasoning over raw numerical inputs to achieve a Spearman correlation of 0.67. The research highlights the potential for VLMs to provide explainable evaluations in complex human motion tasks, offering a practical pathway toward reducing subjectivity in expert judging.
Can Vision-Language Models Judge Olympic Diving? From Reasoning to Scores in Zero-Shot Action Quality Assessment
arXiv:2609.19354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated action quality assessment (AQA) in Olympic sports remains a challenging task due to the complexity of human motion and the subjectivity inherent in expert judging. This work evaluates the capability of open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to perform zero-shot action quality assessment on Olympic diving videos using the AQA-7 benchmark dataset. In this regard, a regression-based framework is pro-posed to leverage both the semantic reasoning and phase-level sub-scores generated by the VLMs, combining TF-IDF vectorization, dimensionality reduction, and ensemble learning to predict final competition scores. Experimental results show that standalone VLMs achieve moderate Spearman correlations below 0.32, while the proposed ensemble regression framework substantially improves performance in the reported evaluation, reaching a Spearman correlation of 0.67 with a four-model configuration. Textual reasoning features con-sistently outperformed raw numerical sub-scores, highlighting the richness of VLM-generated explanations for action quality analysis. These findings suggest that VLMs hold strong potential as assistive tools for explainable and semi-automated sports performance evaluation. The code is publicly available on GitHub https://github.com/hvelesaca/olympic diving judge vlm
Title:Can Vision-Language Models Judge Olympic Diving? From Reasoning to Scores in Zero-Shot Action Quality Assessment
Abstract:Automated action quality assessment (AQA) in Olympic sports remains a challenging task due to the complexity of human motion and the subjectivity inherent in expert judging. This work evaluates the capability of open-source Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to perform zero-shot action quality assessment on Olympic diving videos using the AQA-7 benchmark dataset. In this regard, a regression-based framework is pro-posed to leverage both the semantic reasoning and phase-level sub-scores generated by the VLMs, combining TF-IDF vectorization, dimensionality reduction, and ensemble learning to predict final competition scores. Experimental results show that standalone VLMs achieve moderate Spearman correlations below 0.32, while the proposed ensemble regression framework substantially improves performance in the reported evaluation, reaching a Spearman correlation of 0.67 with a four-model configuration. Textual reasoning features con-sistently outperformed raw numerical sub-scores, highlighting the richness of VLM-generated explanations for action quality analysis. These findings suggest that VLMs hold strong potential as assistive tools for explainable and semi-automated sports performance evaluation. The code is publicly available on GitHub this https URL diving judge vlm
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.19354 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2609.19354v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.19354 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words
Related coverage
Why Dwarkesh is Wrong about Computer Use + How OpenAI shipped its Jev competitor in 1 Week
Latent Space · Sep 30, 2026

Apertus 1.5 Release Notes
Hugging Face · Oct 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026