aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the Matrix Muon optimizer, demonstrating that representation learning can persist even when training loss plateaus due to period-2 oscillations near stability boundaries. By normalizing updates by gradient rank rather than norm, the study reveals conditions under which feature alignment with the target subspace continues independently of immediate loss reduction. These findings offer critical theoretical bounds for understanding optimization dynamics in deep learning models where standard convergence metrics may misrepresent actual learning progress.
Can Representation Learning Decouple from Loss Minimization? Polar Updates Have an Answer
arXiv:2609.36240v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Does representation learning stop when the training loss stops improving? We study this question for matrix Muon, whose polar-normalised updates have a step length set by the gradient's rank rather than its norm. Near the edge of stability, full-batch Muon on teacher-student problems enters approximately period-2 loss oscillations that persist for thousands of steps: the cycle-mean loss stays flat or rises, yet the weights keep moving and the learned features continue to align with the teacher subspace. For linear teacher-student learning toys, we derive explicit cycle and alignment formulas and conditional plateau and decay bounds. For a population mean-field ReLU model, we prove that, under stated dimension, initialisation and small-head conditions, the leading eigenspace of the average gradient outer product (AGOP) recovers the teacher subspace exactly during a loss plateau, before the loss later drops. In all 33 ReLU, GELU and SiLU teacher configurations we study, direction-only alignment metrics show the student AGOP aligned with, or still aligning to, the teacher subspace during the period-2 oscillations; projected head refitting on selected configurations shows that the learned directions are useful for prediction, and further measurements distinguish AGOP alignment from weight-mass concentration. In deep residual ReLU students, freezing the downstream layers while the first layer trains with full-batch exact polar updates recreates a nearly flat cycle-mean loss with improving input-AGOP alignment; freezing and unfreezing switch between this plateau and loss decrease, and the effect is sensitive to momentum and to the choice of orthogonaliser.
Title:Can Representation Learning Decouple from Loss Minimization? Polar Updates Have an Answer
Abstract:Does representation learning stop when the training loss stops improving? We study this question for matrix Muon, whose polar-normalised updates have a step length set by the gradient's rank rather than its norm. Near the edge of stability, full-batch Muon on teacher-student problems enters approximately period-2 loss oscillations that persist for thousands of steps: the cycle-mean loss stays flat or rises, yet the weights keep moving and the learned features continue to align with the teacher subspace. For linear teacher-student learning toys, we derive explicit cycle and alignment formulas and conditional plateau and decay bounds. For a population mean-field ReLU model, we prove that, under stated dimension, initialisation and small-head conditions, the leading eigenspace of the average gradient outer product (AGOP) recovers the teacher subspace exactly during a loss plateau, before the loss later drops. In all 33 ReLU, GELU and SiLU teacher configurations we study, direction-only alignment metrics show the student AGOP aligned with, or still aligning to, the teacher subspace during the period-2 oscillations; projected head refitting on selected configurations shows that the learned directions are useful for prediction, and further measurements distinguish AGOP alignment from weight-mass concentration. In deep residual ReLU students, freezing the downstream layers while the first layer trains with full-batch exact polar updates recreates a nearly flat cycle-mean loss with improving input-AGOP alignment; freezing and unfreezing switch between this plateau and loss decrease, and the effect is sensitive to momentum and to the choice of orthogonaliser.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.36240 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.36240v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36240 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 355 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Scaling RL with verl on AMD Instinct MI355X: Async Walkthrough and Sync Benchmark
AMD · Aug 18, 2026
Loss-Guided Adaptive Scale Refinement for Molecular Force Prediction
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026