aiqbench analysis
This study investigates the feasibility of fusing frozen Relational Transformer embeddings directly into a large language model as soft tokens to handle structured data. The results indicate that this hybrid approach fails to outperform standalone relational encoders and often performs worse than random guessing, highlighting significant instability during reinforcement learning training. These negative findings suggest that current fusion strategies require more robust alignment objectives and schema-aware designs before becoming viable for reliable relational prediction tasks.
Can LLMs Use Relational Transformer Embeddings?
arXiv:2609.00457v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Injecting frozen relational-encoder embeddings as soft tokens into a large language model (LLM) is a conceptually appealing fusion strategy: the encoder handles multi-table structure, the LLM handles language and reasoning, and no lossy text serialization is required. We test this hypothesis concretely by injecting embeddings from a frozen Relational Transformer (RT) into Qwen3.5-4B via a learned MLP projection and LoRA adaptation, trained first with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on chain-of-thought reasoning traces and then with group-based reinforcement learning (GSPO). We evaluate across 10 binary classification tasks on 6 relational databases from RelBench, under four supervision regimes: single-task (ST), within-dataset (WD), cross-dataset (CD), and all-task (ALL). The hybrid model does not consistently outperform standalone RT: it is frequently below random, highly sensitive to serialization format and relational-token budget, and unstable under RL training. We report these negative results and analyze the failure modes, arguing that soft-token fusion requires stronger alignment objectives and schema-aware design before it can serve as a reliable route to relational prediction.
Title:Can LLMs Use Relational Transformer Embeddings?
Abstract:Injecting frozen relational-encoder embeddings as soft tokens into a large language model (LLM) is a conceptually appealing fusion strategy: the encoder handles multi-table structure, the LLM handles language and reasoning, and no lossy text serialization is required. We test this hypothesis concretely by injecting embeddings from a frozen Relational Transformer (RT) into Qwen3.5-4B via a learned MLP projection and LoRA adaptation, trained first with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on chain-of-thought reasoning traces and then with group-based reinforcement learning (GSPO). We evaluate across 10 binary classification tasks on 6 relational databases from RelBench, under four supervision regimes: single-task (ST), within-dataset (WD), cross-dataset (CD), and all-task (ALL). The hybrid model does not consistently outperform standalone RT: it is frequently below random, highly sensitive to serialization format and relational-token budget, and unstable under RL training. We report these negative results and analyze the failure modes, arguing that soft-token fusion requires stronger alignment objectives and schema-aware design before it can serve as a reliable route to relational prediction.
Accepted at the 2nd Foundation Models for Structured Data Workshop at ICML 2026, Seoul, South Korea. OpenReview: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.00457 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.00457v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00457 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 283 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Presentation: Autonomous Data Products for the Autonomous Era: Rethinking Data Architecture for GenAI
InfoQ · Jul 24, 2026

[AINews] Here are 6 Clones of Jev in 2 days
Latent Space · Sep 19, 2026