Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research demonstrates that Large Language Models possess latent world knowledge for temporal event prediction, provided the input interface separates semantic descriptions from prediction labels to mitigate bias. By introducing a benchmark of 150K described events, the study proves that capable LLMs significantly outperform specialized baselines when given natural-language grounding, framing the limitation as an interface design issue rather than a lack of internal knowledge.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, SiliconANGLE, IEEE Spectrum
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Can LLMs Access their World Knowledge for Event Prediction?

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.19021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has questioned whether large language models (LLMs) can be useful for temporal event prediction. Despite vast pretrained world knowledge, LLMs often underperform simpler specialized models. We ask whether this knowledge is truly inaccessible, or whether current methods fail to present event prediction in a form LLMs can use. We argue for the latter and show that LLMs become effective event forecasters when the interface is designed around two choices. The first grounds each event in a natural-language description, and the second separates event semantics from the prediction space to prevent semantic bias from label associations. To test this, we introduce DescribeEvent, a benchmark of ~150K events across seven datasets and six domains with event-level descriptions. We find that capable LLMs substantially benefit from descriptions and symbolic labels, outperforming description-free variants and non-LLM baselines, while weaker models gain little. These results suggest that accessing LLM world knowledge for event prediction is an interface problem, and that event descriptions offer a practical way to elicit the knowledge LLMs already encode.

Title:Can LLMs Access their World Knowledge for Event Prediction?

Abstract:Recent work has questioned whether large language models (LLMs) can be useful for temporal event prediction. Despite vast pretrained world knowledge, LLMs often underperform simpler specialized models. We ask whether this knowledge is truly inaccessible, or whether current methods fail to present event prediction in a form LLMs can use. We argue for the latter and show that LLMs become effective event forecasters when the interface is designed around two choices. The first grounds each event in a natural-language description, and the second separates event semantics from the prediction space to prevent semantic bias from label associations. To test this, we introduce DescribeEvent, a benchmark of ~150K events across seven datasets and six domains with event-level descriptions. We find that capable LLMs substantially benefit from descriptions and symbolic labels, outperforming description-free variants and non-LLM baselines, while weaker models gain little. These results suggest that accessing LLM world knowledge for event prediction is an interface problem, and that event descriptions offer a practical way to elicit the knowledge LLMs already encode.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.19021 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.19021v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19021 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words

Related coverage