aiqbench analysis
The paper introduces CoffeeBench, a benchmark that tests LLM agents on fault diagnosis in a simulated appliance, moving beyond exam-style evaluations toward practical operational tasks. Its main findings are that models struggle to diagnose faults from sensor data alone, while the strongest ones succeed by iteratively narrowing the fault options. For AI readers, the useful signals are the proposed selective-prediction heuristics (initial uncertainty and judged reasoning quality) and the evidence that explicit state tracking helps open-weight models avoid timeouts. Since it is a single simulated setting, the results indicate direction more than industrial readiness.
Can LLM Agents Efficiently Identify Appliance Faults? Insights From Diagnosing a Simulated Appliance
arXiv:2610.19291v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In so-called "Industry 4.0," integrated sensors, analytics tools, and other digital technologies supplement industrial workflows, potentiating enhanced visibility and automation. Prognostics and health management (PHM) and natural language processing (NLP) practitioners alike have explored the application of large language models (LLMs) to industrial asset management, but many prior works' focus on exam-like benchmarks has limited their assessment of LLMs' ability to automate practical operations. Herein, we introduce CoffeeBench, a fault diagnostics task for LLM agents, using a simulated appliance. The LLMs we evaluate struggle to consistently identify faults from the sensor information alone, but the best-performing ones can iteratively refine the fault-option space to eventually obtain a successful diagnosis. Our subsequent analyses, therefore, focus on: differentiating models by diagnostic efficiency (RQ1); examining the lagging performance of the three worst models (RQ2); and identifying viable heuristics for selective prediction (RQ3), including that initial diagnostic uncertainty and LLM-judged soundness of reasoning are high-signal predictors of diagnostic success. In addition to our benchmark results (Section 3.1), we provide practical insights for improving the performance of the open-weight models on CoffeeBench, such as by explicitly tracking episode state on their behalf to reduce timeouts (Section 3.2) or applying a deliberation loop to refine diagnostic hypotheses (Section 3.3).
Title:Can LLM Agents Efficiently Identify Appliance Faults? Insights From Diagnosing a Simulated Appliance
Abstract:In so-called "Industry 4.0," integrated sensors, analytics tools, and other digital technologies supplement industrial workflows, potentiating enhanced visibility and automation. Prognostics and health management (PHM) and natural language processing (NLP) practitioners alike have explored the application of large language models (LLMs) to industrial asset management, but many prior works' focus on exam-like benchmarks has limited their assessment of LLMs' ability to automate practical operations. Herein, we introduce CoffeeBench, a fault diagnostics task for LLM agents, using a simulated appliance. The LLMs we evaluate struggle to consistently identify faults from the sensor information alone, but the best-performing ones can iteratively refine the fault-option space to eventually obtain a successful diagnosis. Our subsequent analyses, therefore, focus on: differentiating models by diagnostic efficiency (RQ1); examining the lagging performance of the three worst models (RQ2); and identifying viable heuristics for selective prediction (RQ3), including that initial diagnostic uncertainty and LLM-judged soundness of reasoning are high-signal predictors of diagnostic success. In addition to our benchmark results (Section 3.1), we provide practical insights for improving the performance of the open-weight models on CoffeeBench, such as by explicitly tracking episode state on their behalf to reduce timeouts (Section 3.2) or applying a deliberation loop to refine diagnostic hypotheses (Section 3.3).
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.19291 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.19291v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19291 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words
Related coverage

How Trane gets building insights 60x faster with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Sep 22, 2026

Optimizing production agents with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Observability
AWS · Jul 31, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026

34 Amazon Research Awards Build on Trainium recipients announced
Amazon Science · Aug 5, 2026