aiqbench analysis
This study rigorously evaluates large language models for automating data extraction in agricultural meta-analyses, finding that direct zero-shot prompting offers the most consistent performance despite significant accuracy gaps against human-labeled ground truth. The research highlights current limitations in estimating statistical magnitudes while confirming that LLMs can reliably recover the direction of relationships between variables in complex domains like intercropping.
Can Generative AI Automate Data Extraction for Meta-Analysis? A Case Study on Intercropping Research
arXiv:2609.35089v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Meta-analysis is the synthesis of information from multiple sources to arrive at an overarching conclusion. There is a large need for meta-analysis in agricultural research to synthesize what is known and analyze overarching patterns. Extracting data from published literature is, however, labor-intensive, time-consuming, and tedious, and is impeded by a lack of standardization in research design, units of measurement, and terminology. These challenges are particularly evident in the domain of crop species mixtures, also called intercropping. With the growing capabilities of LLMs, many recent attempts have focused on building systems and tools to automate data collection, yet rigorous assessment against human-labeled ground truth is often missing. In this research, we evaluate three LLM-based approaches---direct zero-shot prompting, a staged workflow, and a multi-agent system---with six open-weight models to extract data from the intercropping literature. The results are evaluated against the manually curated ground truth and through a downstream statistical analysis. Overall, direct zero-shot prompting is the strongest and most consistent approach, achieving the highest mean similarity-adjusted F1 of 0.577, although none of the approaches is close to fully accurate. In the downstream analysis, most model--approach combinations recover the direction of the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables, but do not estimate its magnitude accurately.
Title:Can Generative AI Automate Data Extraction for Meta-Analysis? A Case Study on Intercropping Research
Abstract:Meta-analysis is the synthesis of information from multiple sources to arrive at an overarching conclusion. There is a large need for meta-analysis in agricultural research to synthesize what is known and analyze overarching patterns. Extracting data from published literature is, however, labor-intensive, time-consuming, and tedious, and is impeded by a lack of standardization in research design, units of measurement, and terminology. These challenges are particularly evident in the domain of crop species mixtures, also called intercropping. With the growing capabilities of LLMs, many recent attempts have focused on building systems and tools to automate data collection, yet rigorous assessment against human-labeled ground truth is often missing. In this research, we evaluate three LLM-based approaches---direct zero-shot prompting, a staged workflow, and a multi-agent system---with six open-weight models to extract data from the intercropping literature. The results are evaluated against the manually curated ground truth and through a downstream statistical analysis. Overall, direct zero-shot prompting is the strongest and most consistent approach, achieving the highest mean similarity-adjusted F1 of 0.577, although none of the approaches is close to fully accurate. In the downstream analysis, most model--approach combinations recover the direction of the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables, but do not estimate its magnitude accurately.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.35089 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.35089v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35089 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Agents disprove Polysemanticity; greatly improve Interpretability & Alignment
Latent Space · Oct 16, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026