aiqbench analysis
This study introduces TaxoBench to rigorously evaluate how well Deep Research Agents can retrieve essential papers and organize them into expert-level taxonomies. Results reveal significant bottlenecks in both retrieval accuracy and hierarchical depth, demonstrating that current models struggle to match the synthesis capabilities of human experts without fragmenting knowledge structures. These findings highlight critical gaps in automated survey writing tools before they are deployed for complex research tasks.
Can Deep Research Agents Retrieve and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies
arXiv:2601.12369v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep Research Agents increasingly automate survey writing, yet existing benchmarks do not jointly test whether they retrieve the papers experts consider essential and organize those papers into paper-grounded taxonomies. We introduce TaxoBench, a benchmark built from 72 highly cited LLM surveys, 3,815 cited papers, and their expert-authored taxonomies. TaxoBench evaluates systems in two settings: Deep Research mode measures end-to-end retrieval and organization from a topic, while Bottom-Up mode provides the expert paper set and isolates organization. We evaluate leaf-level assignments with ARI and V-Measure and hierarchy-level structure with US-TED, US-NTED, and Sem-Path. Across 7 Deep Research Agents and 16 LLM configurations, the best agent retrieves only 20.92% of expert-cited papers, and none of 70 standard Bottom-Up runs reaches the experts' average depth of 4.86. A controlled probe shows that models which match this depth do so by fragmenting the taxonomy, reducing alignment with the expert reference. We further find that raw Sem-Path remains near a no-organization floor even when a newer model generation gains 3.68 pp ARI; after depth matching, humans lead on all 10 matched surveys by 13.27 pp. These results identify retrieval and hierarchical organization as separate bottlenecks and show why hierarchy metrics must be calibrated before they are used to compare models.
Title:Can Deep Research Agents Retrieve and Organize? Evaluating the Synthesis Gap with Expert Taxonomies
Abstract:Deep Research Agents increasingly automate survey writing, yet existing benchmarks do not jointly test whether they retrieve the papers experts consider essential and organize those papers into paper-grounded taxonomies. We introduce TaxoBench, a benchmark built from 72 highly cited LLM surveys, 3,815 cited papers, and their expert-authored taxonomies. TaxoBench evaluates systems in two settings: Deep Research mode measures end-to-end retrieval and organization from a topic, while Bottom-Up mode provides the expert paper set and isolates organization. We evaluate leaf-level assignments with ARI and V-Measure and hierarchy-level structure with US-TED, US-NTED, and Sem-Path. Across 7 Deep Research Agents and 16 LLM configurations, the best agent retrieves only 20.92% of expert-cited papers, and none of 70 standard Bottom-Up runs reaches the experts' average depth of 4.86. A controlled probe shows that models which match this depth do so by fragmenting the taxonomy, reducing alignment with the expert reference. We further find that raw Sem-Path remains near a no-organization floor even when a newer model generation gains 3.68 pp ARI; after depth matching, humans lead on all 10 matched surveys by 13.27 pp. These results identify retrieval and hierarchical organization as separate bottlenecks and show why hierarchy metrics must be calibrated before they are used to compare models.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2601.12369 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2601.12369v5 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.12369 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 312 words
Related coverage

XtalPi Holdings Limited: XtalPi Holdings Announces 2026 Interim Results
finanznachrichten.de · Aug 19, 2026
Mr.LHDR: A Benchmark for Multimodal Real-World Long-Horizon Deep Research Agents
arXiv · Sep 12, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026
Mind2Report: Expert-Level Commercial Report Synthesis via Cognitive Deep Research Agent
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026