aiqbench analysis
This study of academic researchers reveals that while AI/ML effectively accelerates sustaining innovations in materials science through efficient design space exploration, it struggles to replace the theoretical breakthroughs enabled by conventional empirical methods. The findings caution against over-reliance on data-driven tools outside established domains and emphasize the continued necessity for skilled human oversight alongside traditional research techniques to foster truly disruptive advances.
Can Artificial Intelligence Accelerate Technological Progress? Researchers' Perspectives on AI in Manufacturing and Materials Science
arXiv:2511.14007v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) raises expectations of substantial increases in rates of technological progress, but such anticipations are often not connected to detailed ground-level studies of AI use in innovation processes. Accordingly, it remains unclear how and to what extent AI can accelerate innovation. To help to fill this gap, we explore and assess results from 32 interviews with U.S.-based academic manufacturing and materials sciences researchers experienced with AI and machine learning (ML) techniques. We found that AI was primarily used for modeling of materials and manufacturing processes, facilitating cheaper and more rapid search of design spaces for materials and manufacturing processes alike. Benefits included cost, time, and computation savings in technology development. However, AI/ML tools were unreliable outside design spaces for which dense data were already available; they required skilled and judicious application in tandem with older research techniques; and concerns were raised about the potential to detrimentally circumvent opportunities for disruptive theoretical advancement. Based on these results, we suggest there is reason for optimism about acceleration in sustaining innovations through the use of AI/ML; but that support for conventional empirical, computational, and theoretical research is required to maintain the likelihood of further disruptive advances in manufacturing and materials.
Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) raises expectations of substantial increases in rates of technological progress, but such anticipations are often not connected to detailed ground-level studies of AI use in innovation processes. Accordingly, it remains unclear how and to what extent AI can accelerate innovation. To help to fill this gap, we explore and assess results from 32 interviews with U.S.-based academic manufacturing and materials sciences researchers experienced with AI and machine learning (ML) techniques. We found that AI was primarily used for modeling of materials and manufacturing processes, facilitating cheaper and more rapid search of design spaces for materials and manufacturing processes alike. Benefits included cost, time, and computation savings in technology development. However, AI/ML tools were unreliable outside design spaces for which dense data were already available; they required skilled and judicious application in tandem with older research techniques; and concerns were raised about the potential to detrimentally circumvent opportunities for disruptive theoretical advancement. Based on these results, we suggest there is reason for optimism about acceleration in sustaining innovations through the use of AI/ML; but that support for conventional empirical, computational, and theoretical research is required to maintain the likelihood of further disruptive advances in manufacturing and materials.
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2511.14007 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2511.14007v3 [cs.CY] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 214 words
Related coverage

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
fool.com · Aug 18, 2026

Pentagon event spotlights 70 years of DoW ManTech investment
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 14, 2026

SkyWater’s Gilbert sees system integration as key to quantum
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 29, 2026

€250,000 Maximum Budget for ESA’s De-Risk Technology Activities
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 10, 2026