aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical bottleneck in deploying mobile GUI agents by quantifying reliability drops when models encounter personalized interfaces shaped by individual user histories. The authors propose RePAIR, a reinforcement learning method that explicitly trains on cross-user variations to mitigate failures caused by selecting incorrect items in personalized contexts. These findings are essential for advancing robust, generalizable AI agents capable of functioning reliably across diverse human environments rather than just standardized benchmarks.
Can Agents Work for Everyone? Cross-User Reliability for Mobile GUI Agents in Personalized User Interfaces
arXiv:2610.07972v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mobile GUI agents increasingly operate on interfaces influenced by users' histories and preferences, but their reliability across different users remains underexplored. We introduce PAIR (Personalized Application-state Instantiation and Rendering), a pipeline for constructing user-conditioned application states that enables controlled evaluation of the same task across different users. We further introduce RePAIR (Reinforcement learning with Personalization-Aware Interaction Rewards), a training approach that learns from cross-user differences in subgoal outcomes to improve reliability across user-conditioned mobile environments. Across six agents, we find substantial variation in task success across users and consistently lower subgoal achievement in user-conditioned UI contexts (6.98 to 15.4 pp). This gap further increases for personal targets drawn from each user's own content (8.77 to 22.0 pp). Failures in these contexts frequently involve selecting another item instead of the intended target, particularly before target exposure. Finally, RePAIR improves user-conditioned SAR (+5.87 pp), all-success (+7.50 pp), and overall Task SR (+9.42 pp) over its supervised fine-tuning parent on unseen users, providing initial evidence that explicitly learning from cross-user variation can improve GUI-agent reliability.
Title:Can Agents Work for Everyone? Cross-User Reliability for Mobile GUI Agents in Personalized User Interfaces
Abstract:Mobile GUI agents increasingly operate on interfaces influenced by users' histories and preferences, but their reliability across different users remains underexplored. We introduce PAIR (Personalized Application-state Instantiation and Rendering), a pipeline for constructing user-conditioned application states that enables controlled evaluation of the same task across different users. We further introduce RePAIR (Reinforcement learning with Personalization-Aware Interaction Rewards), a training approach that learns from cross-user differences in subgoal outcomes to improve reliability across user-conditioned mobile environments. Across six agents, we find substantial variation in task success across users and consistently lower subgoal achievement in user-conditioned UI contexts (6.98 to 15.4 pp). This gap further increases for personal targets drawn from each user's own content (8.77 to 22.0 pp). Failures in these contexts frequently involve selecting another item instead of the intended target, particularly before target exposure. Finally, RePAIR improves user-conditioned SAR (+5.87 pp), all-success (+7.50 pp), and overall Task SR (+9.42 pp) over its supervised fine-tuning parent on unseen users, providing initial evidence that explicitly learning from cross-user variation can improve GUI-agent reliability.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.07972 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.07972v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07972 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words
Related coverage

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

The SaaSpocalypse that wasn’t, with Atlassian CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes
The Verge · Sep 28, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Announcing the 2026 Databricks Customer Awards Industry winners
Databricks · Jun 9, 2026