Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces LibraryDesignBench, a benchmark evaluating how well AI agents can create reusable code libraries for other agents. The study reveals that while agents can replicate human-designed abstractions, downstream users often ignore these libraries due to rigidity and poor usability rather than missing functionality. Improving agent-first guidance and testing with subagents significantly enhances library adoption and simplifies generated programs.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, AWS, Salesforce Blog
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.36730v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agents increasingly build on code written by other agents, and they reimplement rather than reuse, growing the codebases later agents must work in. To measure how well agents design libraries for other agents, we introduce LibraryDesignBench, a two-phase benchmark in which an agent implements a full-featured library from a specification that defines required capabilities and potential use cases without prescribing the design. We evaluate the library through the correctness and simplicity of programs written by three user agents from different model families. The benchmark spans 242 expert-validated programming problems across 15 library-design tasks in four languages. On eleven of the fifteen tasks, agent designers reproduce the abstractions of the human-written production library. Downstream agents adopt agent- and human-written libraries alike but underuse them, reimplementing capabilities the library already provides. Our failure analysis finds that downstream agents write extra code mainly because agent-written libraries are rigid or hard to use, not because capabilities are missing. We also experiment with giving designers more prescriptive, agent-first guidance and having them test their library with subagents; this improves downstream scores and yields simpler programs. LibraryDesignBench provides both a testbed for evaluating library-design practices for agent users and an initial design baseline that improves downstream reuse.

Title:Can Agents Design Libraries for Agents?

Abstract:Agents increasingly build on code written by other agents, and they reimplement rather than reuse, growing the codebases later agents must work in. To measure how well agents design libraries for other agents, we introduce LibraryDesignBench, a two-phase benchmark in which an agent implements a full-featured library from a specification that defines required capabilities and potential use cases without prescribing the design. We evaluate the library through the correctness and simplicity of programs written by three user agents from different model families. The benchmark spans 242 expert-validated programming problems across 15 library-design tasks in four languages. On eleven of the fifteen tasks, agent designers reproduce the abstractions of the human-written production library. Downstream agents adopt agent- and human-written libraries alike but underuse them, reimplementing capabilities the library already provides. Our failure analysis finds that downstream agents write extra code mainly because agent-written libraries are rigid or hard to use, not because capabilities are missing. We also experiment with giving designers more prescriptive, agent-first guidance and having them test their library with subagents; this improves downstream scores and yields simpler programs. LibraryDesignBench provides both a testbed for evaluating library-design practices for agent users and an initial design baseline that improves downstream reuse.

26 pages, 6 figures, 11 tables. Code and data: this https URL

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2609.36730 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.36730v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36730 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words

Related coverage