aiqbench analysis
This research demonstrates that an off-the-shelf System-One LLM can outperform specialized deep learning models for knowledge tracing when training data is scarce, offering a cost-effective solution for new educational platforms. The study highlights the potential of general-purpose models to replace fine-tuned or reasoning-heavy approaches in specific machine learning tasks without requiring extensive historical learner logs.
Can a System-One LLM Perform Knowledge Tracing When Few or No Learners Are Logged?
arXiv:2610.11135v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge tracing (KT) models need many logged learners, so a new course or platform starts without a usable model. In LLM-based KT the LLM generates the answer, which we call System-Two; it is either fine-tuned on the target data or reasons and votes over ten samples, which is slow and gives coarse probabilities. We ask whether an off-the-shelf System-One LLM, which returns a probability for a typed question directly in a single pass, can perform KT when few or no learners are logged. On seven datasets, Jev without any data from the target platform reaches a mean AUC of .706, above the best of 28 deep KT models trained on 8 learners (.689) and above System-Two Thinking-KT on all seven datasets (.650) at about 1/100 of its API cost. Adding examples and a similar-learner statistic from the logged learners (JevKT) raises this to .722; JevKT stays significantly ahead of deep KT up to 16 learners and ahead on average up to 64, and supervised KT catches up between 64 and 128 learners. Among the readers we tested, the gain is specific to Jev, since three other LLMs queried with the byte-identical typed request through the official System-One adapter fall below it on all seven datasets, and reader swaps and contamination checks find no evidence that the input format or memorised data explain the gain. For new learners the advantage holds from their first interactions, whereas on unseen items with all learners logged, deep KT remains ahead.
Title:Can a System-One LLM Perform Knowledge Tracing When Few or No Learners Are Logged?
Abstract:Knowledge tracing (KT) models need many logged learners, so a new course or platform starts without a usable model. In LLM-based KT the LLM generates the answer, which we call System-Two; it is either fine-tuned on the target data or reasons and votes over ten samples, which is slow and gives coarse probabilities. We ask whether an off-the-shelf System-One LLM, which returns a probability for a typed question directly in a single pass, can perform KT when few or no learners are logged. On seven datasets, Jev without any data from the target platform reaches a mean AUC of .706, above the best of 28 deep KT models trained on 8 learners (.689) and above System-Two Thinking-KT on all seven datasets (.650) at about 1/100 of its API cost. Adding examples and a similar-learner statistic from the logged learners (JevKT) raises this to .722; JevKT stays significantly ahead of deep KT up to 16 learners and ahead on average up to 64, and supervised KT catches up between 64 and 128 learners. Among the readers we tested, the gain is specific to Jev, since three other LLMs queried with the byte-identical typed request through the official System-One adapter fall below it on all seven datasets, and reader swaps and contamination checks find no evidence that the input format or memorised data explain the gain. For new learners the advantage holds from their first interactions, whereas on unseen items with all learners logged, deep KT remains ahead.
41 pages, 7 figures. Code and result summaries: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.11135 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.11135v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11135 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 373 words
Related coverage

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026

Presentation: Ontology‐Driven Observability: Building the E2E Knowledge Graph at Netflix Scale
InfoQ · Oct 9, 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 18, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026