Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces CALIBURN, a novel framework for LLM unlearning that quantifies model confidence to calibrate gradient updates and mitigate catastrophic forgetting. By reducing reliance on large retention datasets, the method offers a more efficient path to removing undesirable knowledge while preserving general utility, directly addressing critical safety and privacy challenges in deployed AI systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

CALIBURN: Self-Calibrated LLM Unlearning Alignment

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2602.02824v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM unlearning aims to remove the influence of undesirable knowledge from pretrained language models, which offers a practical mechanism for addressing safety and privacy concerns. Existing unlearning approaches, such as Gradient Ascent, are prone to catastrophic forgetting. Alignment-based approaches provide an alternative direction, yet their effectiveness is limited by the quality of the reference model. In realistic settings, both methods still require large retention datasets to preserve general knowledge. We propose a principled method that quantifies the target LLM's confidence in undesirable knowledge and uses it to calibrate the model's unlearning gradient updates more precisely. It enables fine-grained control over forgetting while better preserving model utility, thus reducing the dependence on retention data or prohibitive unlearning training data. Extensive evaluations on multiple benchmarks, including MUSE and WMDP, show that our method achieves effective unlearning and improves the trade-off between knowledge removal and utility preservation compared with state-of-the-art methods.

Abstract:LLM unlearning aims to remove the influence of undesirable knowledge from pretrained language models, which offers a practical mechanism for addressing safety and privacy concerns. Existing unlearning approaches, such as Gradient Ascent, are prone to catastrophic forgetting. Alignment-based approaches provide an alternative direction, yet their effectiveness is limited by the quality of the reference model. In realistic settings, both methods still require large retention datasets to preserve general knowledge. We propose a principled method that quantifies the target LLM's confidence in undesirable knowledge and uses it to calibrate the model's unlearning gradient updates more precisely. It enables fine-grained control over forgetting while better preserving model utility, thus reducing the dependence on retention data or prohibitive unlearning training data. Extensive evaluations on multiple benchmarks, including MUSE and WMDP, show that our method achieves effective unlearning and improves the trade-off between knowledge removal and utility preservation compared with state-of-the-art methods.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2602.02824 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2602.02824v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.02824 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words

Related coverage