aiqbench analysis
This study presents a calibrated routing policy for disaggregated LLM serving that dynamically estimates completion times based on prompt length, KV cache pressure, and SLO classes to maximize goodput. Validated on eight NVIDIA A40 GPUs under saturation, the approach outperforms standard heuristics like round-robin and least-loaded strategies, particularly in heterogeneous traffic scenarios with larger decode pools. The research highlights that while simulator-derived calibration constants offer significant performance gains, their benefits diminish in small-scale deployments where simple queue counting suffices.
Calibrate, Then Route: A Measured Study of Learned Request Routing for Disaggregated LLM Serving
arXiv:2609.16206v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Disaggregated LLM serving places compute heavy prefill and memory heavy decode on separate GPU pools. Systems such as DistServe, Splitwise, and Mooncake make this separation fast, but routing still determines which instances handle each request. We study a router that estimates the additional completion time on each instance using exact prompt length, predicted output length, post admission KV cache pressure, and SLO class. We develop the policy in a discrete event simulator and validate it on eight NVIDIA A40 GPUs, each running a vLLM engine, with NIXL transferring KV caches between pools. All workloads run at measured saturation. Across three mixed, bursty arrival traces, the calibrated router achieves the highest mean goodput at 0.864, compared with 0.835 to 0.847 for round robin, least loaded, and a length heuristic. It also shows the lowest variance across traces. It beats round robin and the length heuristic on all three traces and least loaded on two. On the third, it trails by 0.003, within run to run noise. Hardware calibration matters: simulator derived constants cost 4.5 goodput points and roughly 40 percent of the tail latency advantage, reducing the scorer to little more than queue counting. Benefits grow with decode pool size and traffic heterogeneity but disappear in pools with three instances, where queue counts are often enough. Under extreme scarcity, greedy cost minimization concentrates requests on the cheapest scored instance, and blind spreading performs better. With calibrated costs, the learned router matches the goodput of round robin using six GPUs instead of seven.
Abstract:Disaggregated LLM serving places compute heavy prefill and memory heavy decode on separate GPU pools. Systems such as DistServe, Splitwise, and Mooncake make this separation fast, but routing still determines which instances handle each request. We study a router that estimates the additional completion time on each instance using exact prompt length, predicted output length, post admission KV cache pressure, and SLO class. We develop the policy in a discrete event simulator and validate it on eight NVIDIA A40 GPUs, each running a vLLM engine, with NIXL transferring KV caches between pools. All workloads run at measured saturation. Across three mixed, bursty arrival traces, the calibrated router achieves the highest mean goodput at 0.864, compared with 0.835 to 0.847 for round robin, least loaded, and a length heuristic. It also shows the lowest variance across traces. It beats round robin and the length heuristic on all three traces and least loaded on two. On the third, it trails by 0.003, within run to run noise. Hardware calibration matters: simulator derived constants cost 4.5 goodput points and roughly 40 percent of the tail latency advantage, reducing the scorer to little more than queue counting. Benefits grow with decode pool size and traffic heterogeneity but disappear in pools with three instances, where queue counts are often enough. Under extreme scarcity, greedy cost minimization concentrates requests on the cheapest scored instance, and blind spreading performs better. With calibrated costs, the learned router matches the goodput of round robin using six GPUs instead of seven.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.16206 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.16206v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16206 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 345 words
Related coverage
[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026
[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026
Quality-Constrained Routing over a Fixed Pool of Quantized Mixture-of-Experts Instances
arXiv · Sep 14, 2026
Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026