aiqbench analysis
CacheRoute introduces a novel routing strategy that balances prefix caching benefits against server load skew in large-scale LLM serving clusters. By utilizing periodic routing plans and shadow replay validation, the method achieves significant throughput gains on models like Llama-3.3-70B while maintaining strict latency SLOs. This work addresses critical infrastructure challenges for deploying efficient inference at scale across distributed GPU environments.
CacheRoute: Planned Prefix-Affinity Routing for Large-Scale LLM Serving
arXiv:2608.19677v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prefix caching avoids prefill only when a repeated request returns to a server that still holds the prefix KV. Cache-blind balancing disperses that reuse; fixed affinity preserves it but can overload a server. CacheRoute resolves this tradeoff with a periodic routing plan. It admits high-rate keys to a stable warm set and places their assignments by expected load. Hot keys may use more than one destination, although every key in our primary semi-synthetic aggregate uses exactly one. On Llama-3.3-70B in fp8 across 60 H100 GPUs, CacheRoute sustains 176+/-11 QPS at a 3.5-s p99 SLO, 2.3x the strongest of five baselines. Served KV-cache hit rate rises from 64.1+/-1.3% under cache-blind balancing to 93.2+/-0.5%. A second semi-synthetic aggregate and controlled 8B and burst experiments separate the effects of affinity and placement. Two 32B workloads provide the counterexamples: when affinity recovers too little KV work, its residual load skew reduces or erases the improvement. We therefore recommend gating any deployment with a shadow replay rather than enabling affinity from workload statistics alone.
Abstract:Prefix caching avoids prefill only when a repeated request returns to a server that still holds the prefix KV. Cache-blind balancing disperses that reuse; fixed affinity preserves it but can overload a server. CacheRoute resolves this tradeoff with a periodic routing plan. It admits high-rate keys to a stable warm set and places their assignments by expected load. Hot keys may use more than one destination, although every key in our primary semi-synthetic aggregate uses exactly one. On Llama-3.3-70B in fp8 across 60 H100 GPUs, CacheRoute sustains 176+/-11 QPS at a 3.5-s p99 SLO, 2.3x the strongest of five baselines. Served KV-cache hit rate rises from 64.1+/-1.3% under cache-blind balancing to 93.2+/-0.5%. A second semi-synthetic aggregate and controlled 8B and burst experiments separate the effects of affinity and placement. Two 32B workloads provide the counterexamples: when affinity recovers too little KV work, its residual load skew reduces or erases the improvement. We therefore recommend gating any deployment with a shadow replay rather than enabling affinity from workload statistics alone.
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.19677 [cs.DC]
(or arXiv:2608.19677v1 [cs.DC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19677 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

Deploying Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod with vLLM
AWS · Sep 9, 2026

Introducing AMD ROCm™ Infera: Scaling Goodput for Agentic AI with Distributed Inference Orchestration
AMD · Jul 23, 2026

Tiered KV cache for large LLMs on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod with Curvine
AWS · Aug 12, 2026