Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This position paper argues that household robots built on foundation models need safety protections that hold in unfamiliar situations, not just the ones they were trained on. It identifies specific failure modes: misread context, forgotten past interactions, and recovery behaviors that become unsafe in new conditions. For AI readers, the practical takeaway is that learned, generalizing behavior creates safety gaps that conventional rule-based checks may not cover, and the paper proposes a research agenda rather than a validated method.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Building Trustworthy Household Robots through Open-World Safety

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.14034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models are expanding robot capabilities, enabling robots to handle more diverse objects, follow sophisticated instructions, and operate in complex environments. These advances bring us to a future in which robots become part of everyday household life. However, cluttered, dynamic household environments also expose robots to unfamiliar objects, tasks, and interactions, making reliable zero-shot task completion an ongoing challenge for robotics research. From a security perspective, we argue for open-world safety: household robots should preserve specified safety requirements in unseen situations, including when they cannot complete the requested task. Safety protections must account for context and interactions that persist across actions and tasks. In this position paper, we examine why existing safety methods can fail to provide this protection. Protection can fail through misinterpreted context, overlooked past interactions, or stopping and recovery strategies that become unsafe under unfamiliar conditions. We therefore propose a research agenda to specify, learn, and ground safety requirements, enforce them with reliable recovery, and evaluate the generalization of such protections. We call for household robots whose safety protections remain reliable beyond the situations, context, and history used to train and develop them, to achieve open-world safety.

Abstract:Foundation models are expanding robot capabilities, enabling robots to handle more diverse objects, follow sophisticated instructions, and operate in complex environments. These advances bring us to a future in which robots become part of everyday household life. However, cluttered, dynamic household environments also expose robots to unfamiliar objects, tasks, and interactions, making reliable zero-shot task completion an ongoing challenge for robotics research. From a security perspective, we argue for open-world safety: household robots should preserve specified safety requirements in unseen situations, including when they cannot complete the requested task. Safety protections must account for context and interactions that persist across actions and tasks. In this position paper, we examine why existing safety methods can fail to provide this protection. Protection can fail through misinterpreted context, overlooked past interactions, or stopping and recovery strategies that become unsafe under unfamiliar conditions. We therefore propose a research agenda to specify, learn, and ground safety requirements, enforce them with reliable recovery, and evaluate the generalization of such protections. We call for household robots whose safety protections remain reliable beyond the situations, context, and history used to train and develop them, to achieve open-world safety.

Robotics (cs.RO); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

arXiv:2610.14034 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.14034v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14034 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words

Related coverage