Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

BudgetBench introduces a standardized protocol for evaluating memory strategies in local LLM agents by treating token budgets as the primary independent variable. This framework addresses critical resource constraints like prefill latency and cache growth, offering reproducible tools to analyze budget-violation rates and quality trade-offs across varying context windows. By exposing non-monotonic performance curves often hidden in single-budget evaluations, it provides essential infrastructure for scaling efficient local model deployments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

BudgetBench: A Budget-Tiered Protocol and Pilot Harness for Memory Strategy Evaluation in Local Large Language Model Agents

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.13149v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: For local large language model agents, active context is a scarce resource: memory capacity, prefill latency, cache growth, and service objectives all constrain how many input tokens each call can afford. We present BudgetBench, an active-budget protocol and reference harness that treats the per-call input-token budget as the independent variable when comparing memory strategies. Holding the model, task, sampler, and decoding fixed, it sweeps budgets over 2K, 4K, 8K, 16K, and 32K tokens and records quality, budget utilization, latency, and, as a first-class outcome, budget-violation rates. The core contribution is this reusable measurement surface: a swappable MemoryStrategy contract, explicit budget enforcement, deterministic or versioned graders, prompt-audit metadata, and reproducibility artifacts, released at https://github.com/aviskaar/budgetbench. We substantiate the protocol with pilot studies rather than final rankings. Across a local qwen2.5:1.5b pilot (89 items each on SWE-bench Verified and LongBench v2), a hosted 50-item Qwen3 30B-A3B LongBench replication with exact tokenization, and a 500-item LongMemEval oracle study scored by the official GPT-4o evaluator, the harness exposes budget-compliance failures, non-monotonic quality curves, and operating points that single-budget evaluation hides. The budgeted-versus-full-context direction remains unresolved: the local slice is near-null and the hosted replication favors full context in point estimate. We report results transparently, including that the early pilot's tokenizer approximation undercounts some served-model prompts, so its violation rows are tokenizer-approximation diagnostics, not claim-bearing results; all timings are operational diagnostics. The reusable contribution is the protocol, harness, and failure-reporting discipline needed to scale fixed-budget memory-strategy evaluation.

Abstract:For local large language model agents, active context is a scarce resource: memory capacity, prefill latency, cache growth, and service objectives all constrain how many input tokens each call can afford. We present BudgetBench, an active-budget protocol and reference harness that treats the per-call input-token budget as the independent variable when comparing memory strategies. Holding the model, task, sampler, and decoding fixed, it sweeps budgets over 2K, 4K, 8K, 16K, and 32K tokens and records quality, budget utilization, latency, and, as a first-class outcome, budget-violation rates. The core contribution is this reusable measurement surface: a swappable MemoryStrategy contract, explicit budget enforcement, deterministic or versioned graders, prompt-audit metadata, and reproducibility artifacts, released at this https URL. We substantiate the protocol with pilot studies rather than final rankings. Across a local qwen2.5:1.5b pilot (89 items each on SWE-bench Verified and LongBench v2), a hosted 50-item Qwen3 30B-A3B LongBench replication with exact tokenization, and a 500-item LongMemEval oracle study scored by the official GPT-4o evaluator, the harness exposes budget-compliance failures, non-monotonic quality curves, and operating points that single-budget evaluation hides. The budgeted-versus-full-context direction remains unresolved: the local slice is near-null and the hosted replication favors full context in point estimate. We report results transparently, including that the early pilot's tokenizer approximation undercounts some served-model prompts, so its violation rows are tokenizer-approximation diagnostics, not claim-bearing results; all timings are operational diagnostics. The reusable contribution is the protocol, harness, and failure-reporting discipline needed to scale fixed-budget memory-strategy evaluation.

44 pages, 4 figures. Code and artifacts: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.13149 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.13149v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13149 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 349 words

Related coverage