aiqbench analysis
This research addresses systemic failures in multi-agent systems by introducing a runtime control framework that uses dependency graphs to selectively repair broken task handoffs. By decoupling execution dependencies and evaluating repairs against formal postconditions, the method significantly boosts task success rates while maintaining low token overhead. It represents a concrete advancement in making collaborative AI workflows more robust and verifiable.
BRIDGE: Selective Boundary Repair with Dependency Graph Evidence in Multi-Agent Systems
arXiv:2610.17805v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a critical paradigm for tackling complex, long-horizon tasks; however, while coordination protocols continue to advance, systemic failures at the inter-agent collaboration interface remain a pervasive bottleneck. In collaborative workflows, systems frequently suffer from \emph{broken handoffs}---where critical task context is omitted, misrouted, or ignored despite each agent emitting locally plausible responses. To address this challenge, we present \method, a verifiable runtime control framework that treats handoff repair as selective intervention over explicit dependency graphs. Central to \method is an integrated fault-attribution and calibration pipeline, \dataset, which decouples execution dependencies and injects counterfactual handoff perturbations to provide empirical supervision for runtime intervention. Leveraging this diagnostic foundation, \method dynamically compiles observable interaction traces into a provenance graph to pinpoint unresolved dependencies, without accessing private agent states. It then evaluates candidate repairs through an empirical gate that weighs expected gains against disruption risks, and executes repairs only when formal local postconditions hold. Extensive evaluations across demanding benchmarks demonstrate that \method boosts task success by up to 12.3 absolute percentage points on SILO-BENCH and 11.1 on TeamBench. Across both backbones, \method maintains strict cost-effectiveness, adding as little as 2.0\% marginal token overhead. Furthermore, on 562 handoff-relevant traces from the MAST benchmark, \method achieves 69.8\% F1 in a single pass, establishing a reliable operational boundary for verifiable coordination repair.
Abstract:Multi-agent collaboration has emerged as a critical paradigm for tackling complex, long-horizon tasks; however, while coordination protocols continue to advance, systemic failures at the inter-agent collaboration interface remain a pervasive bottleneck. In collaborative workflows, systems frequently suffer from \emph{broken handoffs}---where critical task context is omitted, misrouted, or ignored despite each agent emitting locally plausible responses. To address this challenge, we present \method, a verifiable runtime control framework that treats handoff repair as selective intervention over explicit dependency graphs. Central to \method is an integrated fault-attribution and calibration pipeline, \dataset, which decouples execution dependencies and injects counterfactual handoff perturbations to provide empirical supervision for runtime intervention. Leveraging this diagnostic foundation, \method dynamically compiles observable interaction traces into a provenance graph to pinpoint unresolved dependencies, without accessing private agent states. It then evaluates candidate repairs through an empirical gate that weighs expected gains against disruption risks, and executes repairs only when formal local postconditions hold. Extensive evaluations across demanding benchmarks demonstrate that \method boosts task success by up to 12.3 absolute percentage points on SILO-BENCH and 11.1 on TeamBench. Across both backbones, \method maintains strict cost-effectiveness, adding as little as 2.0\% marginal token overhead. Furthermore, on 562 handoff-relevant traces from the MAST benchmark, \method achieves 69.8\% F1 in a single pass, establishing a reliable operational boundary for verifiable coordination repair.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.17805 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.17805v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17805 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 313 words
Related coverage
Locality Does Not Imply Reachability: Boundary Repair in Block-Sparse Causal Attention
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026
XHotpotQA: A Benchmark for Cross-Lingual Knowledge Composition in Multi-Hop Question Answering
arXiv · Aug 31, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026
KAP: Bridging the Knowledge Selection-Runtime Consumption Gap in LLM Systems
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026