aiqbench analysis
This research presents a significant advancement in quantum compiling by breaking the cubic barrier for inverse-free Solovay-Kitaev algorithms, achieving exponents below the previously assumed information-theoretic limit of 3. By fusing prior compilation techniques with a novel "aiming" strategy for unitary corrections, the study demonstrates that highly efficient gate sets can be constructed without inverses, offering practical efficiency gains for quantum circuit optimization.
Breaking the cubic barrier for the inverse-free Solovay-Kitaev algorithm
arXiv:2610.03655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Solovay-Kitaev algorithm states that it is possible to efficiently compile unitaries to accuracy $\epsilon$ in $\text{polylog}(1/\epsilon)$ time using any universal gate set. While Solovay and Kitaev's initial work addressed inverse-closed gate sets, recently Bouland and Giurgic\v{a}-Tiron showed it is possible to efficiently compile arbitrary gate sets without inverses. However, the exponent of their compilation algorithm is high. For example the inverse-free exponent for a qubit is over $8.62$, while information theoretically it is known that an inverse-free exponent of $3$ is possible in any dimension by a result of Oszmaniec, Sawicki, and Horodecki. This leads to a natural question: can one improve the exponent in Bouland and Giurgic\v{a}-Tiron's algorithm? And are there any cases where the inverse-free exponent is below 3, thus surpassing existing information-theoretic arguments? To answer this question, we first show that a special case of the inverse-free compiling problem -- namely Pauli gates supplemented by an irrational rotation of a qubit - admits a highly efficient compilation algorithm with an exponent at most $\approx 2.138$. Our algorithm fuses ideas from prior algorithms of Kuperberg and Sardharwalla, Cubitt, Harrow and Linden to construct an efficient ``Pauli golf'' compilation routine. We then extend these ideas to the general inverse-free case for a qubit, where we give a compiling algorithm with exponent at most $2.988$. This result uses a novel form of approximate ``aiming'' of unitary corrections to improve the compilation efficiency. Our results give two examples of quantum compiling algorithms surpassing information-theoretic arguments, and demonstrate that there are many efficiency gains possible for inverse-free compilation.
Abstract:The Solovay-Kitaev algorithm states that it is possible to efficiently compile unitaries to accuracy $\epsilon$ in $\text{polylog}(1/\epsilon)$ time using any universal gate set. While Solovay and Kitaev's initial work addressed inverse-closed gate sets, recently Bouland and Giurgicǎ-Tiron showed it is possible to efficiently compile arbitrary gate sets without inverses. However, the exponent of their compilation algorithm is high. For example the inverse-free exponent for a qubit is over $8.62$, while information theoretically it is known that an inverse-free exponent of $3$ is possible in any dimension by a result of Oszmaniec, Sawicki, and Horodecki. This leads to a natural question: can one improve the exponent in Bouland and Giurgicǎ-Tiron's algorithm? And are there any cases where the inverse-free exponent is below 3, thus surpassing existing information-theoretic arguments? To answer this question, we first show that a special case of the inverse-free compiling problem -- namely Pauli gates supplemented by an irrational rotation of a qubit - admits a highly efficient compilation algorithm with an exponent at most $\approx 2.138$. Our algorithm fuses ideas from prior algorithms of Kuperberg and Sardharwalla, Cubitt, Harrow and Linden to construct an efficient ``Pauli golf'' compilation routine. We then extend these ideas to the general inverse-free case for a qubit, where we give a compiling algorithm with exponent at most $2.988$. This result uses a novel form of approximate ``aiming'' of unitary corrections to improve the compilation efficiency. Our results give two examples of quantum compiling algorithms surpassing information-theoretic arguments, and demonstrate that there are many efficiency gains possible for inverse-free compilation.
arXiv:2610.03655 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.03655v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03655 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 348 words
Related coverage
A Deep Dive into LDS Optimizations on AMD Instinct MI450 GPUs
AMD · Aug 28, 2026

Import AI 473: The US’s superintelligence strategy; human brain in a mouse skull; and machine hermeneutics
Import AI · Sep 21, 2026

Fast Bosonic Control via Multiphoton Qubit-Oscillator Interactions
Quantum Journal · Oct 1, 2026

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026