aiqbench analysis
BrandEval introduces a novel multi-agent benchmark that shifts LLM evaluation from static, single-turn responses to dynamic, long-horizon stress tests involving consumer feedback and competitor actions. This approach reveals critical limitations in current models regarding tail-risk failures and delayed recovery during product crises, offering a more rigorous framework for assessing risk-sensitive communication strategies.
BrandEval: A Two-Track Multi-Agent Benchmark for Risk-Sensitive LLM Crisis Communication
arXiv:2610.25208v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating LLMs for crisis communication requires more than judging isolated responses, because public feedback and competitor actions can reshape trust over time. Existing benchmarks remain largely static and single-turn, offering limited evidence about long-horizon risk-sensitive communication. We introduce \textbf{BrandEval}, a two-track benchmark for product-crisis communication, focusing on public brand responses to product-related safety, quality, service, and trust incidents. BrandEval-Static evaluates stakeholder-aware strategic analysis, while BrandEval-Dynamic stress-tests response policies in \textbf{BrandPolis}, a controlled multi-agent sandbox with consumer feedback, competitor responses, and trust-risk trajectories. We also construct \textbf{BrandSRD}, a Chinese crisis-response dataset, and instantiate a reference Strategic Agent using \textbf{Strategic Rationale (SR)}. Across proprietary and open-source models, we find that static strategic quality is informative but incomplete: it aligns with some end-state outcomes but does not reliably predict volatility and delayed recovery; dynamic stress tests further expose tail-risk failures under manipulative or weakly grounded policies. The code and dataset will be available at https://github.com/htgan-ai/BrandEval.
Abstract:Evaluating LLMs for crisis communication requires more than judging isolated responses, because public feedback and competitor actions can reshape trust over time. Existing benchmarks remain largely static and single-turn, offering limited evidence about long-horizon risk-sensitive communication. We introduce \textbf{BrandEval}, a two-track benchmark for product-crisis communication, focusing on public brand responses to product-related safety, quality, service, and trust incidents. BrandEval-Static evaluates stakeholder-aware strategic analysis, while BrandEval-Dynamic stress-tests response policies in \textbf{BrandPolis}, a controlled multi-agent sandbox with consumer feedback, competitor responses, and trust-risk trajectories. We also construct \textbf{BrandSRD}, a Chinese crisis-response dataset, and instantiate a reference Strategic Agent using \textbf{Strategic Rationale (SR)}. Across proprietary and open-source models, we find that static strategic quality is informative but incomplete: it aligns with some end-state outcomes but does not reliably predict volatility and delayed recovery; dynamic stress tests further expose tail-risk failures under manipulative or weakly grounded policies. The code and dataset will be available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.25208 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.25208v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.25208 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words