aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses the foundational interpretation of quantum mechanics, specifically analyzing whether the branching mechanism in Everettian theory constitutes a local causal process compatible with relativity. The author argues that if branching is viewed as an emergent phenomenon rather than a fundamental causal event, the theory avoids non-locality without requiring action at a distance. This work contributes to the ongoing theoretical discourse on the consistency of many-worlds interpretations within relativistic frameworks.
Branching (Almost) Everywhere And All at Once
arXiv:2608.18644v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: It is sometimes said that a reason to prefer Everettian quantum mechanics is that it allows one to avoid the kind of spooky action at a distance that is a consequence of quantum entanglement according to other approaches. There is a straightforward argument to show EQM has this virtue, however some advocates argue that this requires we see branching as a local causal process. I explain this reasoning and then show why, given the way Everettians standardly conceive of worlds and branching as emergent phenomena, branching need not be viewed as a causal process for EQM to be relativistically local. Forthcoming in Local Quantum Mechanics, OUP 2026.
Abstract:It is sometimes said that a reason to prefer Everettian quantum mechanics is that it allows one to avoid the kind of spooky action at a distance that is a consequence of quantum entanglement according to other approaches. There is a straightforward argument to show EQM has this virtue, however some advocates argue that this requires we see branching as a local causal process. I explain this reasoning and then show why, given the way Everettians standardly conceive of worlds and branching as emergent phenomena, branching need not be viewed as a causal process for EQM to be relativistically local. Forthcoming in Local Quantum Mechanics, OUP 2026.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
arXiv:2608.18644 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.18644v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18644 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 207 words
Related coverage

Benn Jordan on Flock, privacy, and the new surveillance backlash
The Verge · Oct 15, 2026

Anthropic reasoning without duplicates is just standard Bayesian updating
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Low-Background Minds
LessWrong · Oct 3, 2026

Presentation: Ontology‐Driven Observability: Building the E2E Knowledge Graph at Netflix Scale
InfoQ · Oct 9, 2026