Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

BranchDrive introduces a novel branch-structured dataset designed to improve short-horizon driving prediction by capturing multiple intervention futures alongside canonical expert trajectories. This resource enables rigorous offline evaluation of action-conditioned models, offering significant reductions in normalized regret compared to standard baselines while highlighting current limitations in establishing exact causal effects for safety.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

BranchDrive: A Branch-Structured Dataset for Action-Conditioned Driving Prediction

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.27275v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most autonomous-driving datasets record only the action executed by a behavior policy and the single future that followed, providing limited supervision for comparing alternative ego decisions. We introduce BranchDrive, a branch-structured CARLA dataset and benchmark that pairs one canonical pre-decision history with one nominal expert future and twelve physically executed intervention futures spanning acceleration, braking, and left- and right-steering policies at three magnitudes. Each intervention lasts 2.5 s and is followed by expert recovery. Following control-compliance, modality-completeness, replay-fidelity, and action-leakage audits, the frozen benchmark contains 606 independent branch groups and 7,878 associated trajectories. We evaluate prediction of six continuous short-horizon outcomes and a ten-step ego trajectory using action-only, history-only, structured, visual, multimodal, and privileged bird's-eye-view models. On the held-out test split, the structured history-and-action model achieves a macro normalized mean absolute error of 0.5036 and an average displacement error of 2.2042 m, significantly outperforming both restricted baselines. In full-information offline evaluation, its outcome-derived selector increases balanced policy value from 0.5364 to 0.5704 and reduces normalized regret from 0.2674 to 0.1495 relative to the frozen action prior. However, a validation-calibrated minimum-separation guard rejects every intervention, showing that conservative execution remains unresolved. BranchDrive therefore supports action-conditioned short-horizon prediction and fixed-bank offline decision evaluation, but does not establish exact causal effects, binary safety prediction, or closed-loop safety improvement.

Abstract:Most autonomous-driving datasets record only the action executed by a behavior policy and the single future that followed, providing limited supervision for comparing alternative ego decisions. We introduce BranchDrive, a branch-structured CARLA dataset and benchmark that pairs one canonical pre-decision history with one nominal expert future and twelve physically executed intervention futures spanning acceleration, braking, and left- and right-steering policies at three magnitudes. Each intervention lasts 2.5 s and is followed by expert recovery. Following control-compliance, modality-completeness, replay-fidelity, and action-leakage audits, the frozen benchmark contains 606 independent branch groups and 7,878 associated trajectories. We evaluate prediction of six continuous short-horizon outcomes and a ten-step ego trajectory using action-only, history-only, structured, visual, multimodal, and privileged bird's-eye-view models. On the held-out test split, the structured history-and-action model achieves a macro normalized mean absolute error of 0.5036 and an average displacement error of 2.2042 m, significantly outperforming both restricted baselines. In full-information offline evaluation, its outcome-derived selector increases balanced policy value from 0.5364 to 0.5704 and reduces normalized regret from 0.2674 to 0.1495 relative to the frozen action prior. However, a validation-calibrated minimum-separation guard rejects every intervention, showing that conservative execution remains unresolved. BranchDrive therefore supports action-conditioned short-horizon prediction and fixed-bank offline decision evaluation, but does not establish exact causal effects, binary safety prediction, or closed-loop safety improvement.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.27275 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.27275v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27275 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words

Related coverage