aiqbench analysis
This research introduces BOW, a reinforcement learning framework designed to train language models on the full space of plausible next words rather than collapsing into single deterministic continuations. By using a frozen scorer that evaluates generated trajectories without direct context input, the method encourages broader reasoning paths and mitigates premature convergence in general benchmarks. The approach demonstrates improved correctness across multiple tasks while maintaining predictive capability for intrinsic next-word prediction.
BOW: Training Language Models to Reason Over Plausible Next Words
arXiv:2506.13502v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Next-word prediction (NWP) trains language models against a single observed continuation, even though many contexts admit multiple plausible next words. Recent RL-based next-word reasoning methods make this tension explicit: they reward a model for producing a rationale that supports one context-conditioned continuation, which can turn a pre-existing preference into a confident, self-justifying trajectory. We introduce BOW, an RL framework that instead trains models to produce self-contained, neutral, and comprehensive descriptions of the plausible next-word space. BOW's core reward is mediated by the generated trajectory. The policy conditions on the full context, but a frozen scorer assigns the core reward from the trajectory alone, without receiving the original context as a separate input. The trajectory may restate relevant context; the bottleneck is the missing direct context-to-scorer path in the core reward. BOW-Reg adds a lightweight breadth regularizer around this core term to discourage premature collapse. Across ten general reasoning benchmarks, BOW remains competitive with the original instruction models and often outperforms trained baselines. On both backbones, BOW-Reg achieves the highest SharedRef correctness and the lowest HoWN-Simple single-sense collapse. Human evaluation further shows that BOW-Reg elicits broader next-word reasoning trajectories, while intrinsic NWP results show that these trajectories remain predictive.
Abstract:Next-word prediction (NWP) trains language models against a single observed continuation, even though many contexts admit multiple plausible next words. Recent RL-based next-word reasoning methods make this tension explicit: they reward a model for producing a rationale that supports one context-conditioned continuation, which can turn a pre-existing preference into a confident, self-justifying trajectory. We introduce BOW, an RL framework that instead trains models to produce self-contained, neutral, and comprehensive descriptions of the plausible next-word space. BOW's core reward is mediated by the generated trajectory. The policy conditions on the full context, but a frozen scorer assigns the core reward from the trajectory alone, without receiving the original context as a separate input. The trajectory may restate relevant context; the bottleneck is the missing direct context-to-scorer path in the core reward. BOW-Reg adds a lightweight breadth regularizer around this core term to discourage premature collapse. Across ten general reasoning benchmarks, BOW remains competitive with the original instruction models and often outperforms trained baselines. On both backbones, BOW-Reg achieves the highest SharedRef correctness and the lowest HoWN-Simple single-sense collapse. Human evaluation further shows that BOW-Reg elicits broader next-word reasoning trajectories, while intrinsic NWP results show that these trajectories remain predictive.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2506.13502 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2506.13502v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.13502 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words
Related coverage
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026
How robust are natural language autoencoders to initialization?
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 10, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026