Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study applies meta-learning frameworks to model how consumers transfer knowledge across different decision contexts, such as choosing airlines on various routes. By comparing human behavior against boundedly rational dynamic programming policies, the research identifies that low-complexity models best predict real-world choices involving higher-order uncertainty. The work bridges theoretical machine learning with behavioral economics, offering insights into the computational limits of human meta-learning in sequential consumer tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Boundedly Rational Meta-Learning in Sequential Consumer Choice

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.16532v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Many consumer decisions involve repeated choices under uncertainty, where experience in one context may inform decisions in another. For example, experience with a brand in one market or usage context may shape beliefs about that brand in a new context. We study whether such cross-context transfer takes the form of meta-learning, in which experience across contexts updates higher-order beliefs that guide learning in a new context. In a hierarchical laboratory task, participants choose among airlines across routes and observe noisy binary outcomes. Participants improve both within and across routes, indicating cross-route knowledge transfer. We compare human choices with no-transfer, fully integrated meta-learning, and boundedly rational meta dynamic programming policies, BRMDP(D), where D is the number of hyper-posterior draws used to approximate integration. Trial-by-trial likelihood comparisons show that low-D policies, especially BRMDP(1), best predict participant choices. The results suggest that consumers transfer information across contexts using coarse representations of higher-order uncertainty.

Abstract:Many consumer decisions involve repeated choices under uncertainty, where experience in one context may inform decisions in another. For example, experience with a brand in one market or usage context may shape beliefs about that brand in a new context. We study whether such cross-context transfer takes the form of meta-learning, in which experience across contexts updates higher-order beliefs that guide learning in a new context. In a hierarchical laboratory task, participants choose among airlines across routes and observe noisy binary outcomes. Participants improve both within and across routes, indicating cross-route knowledge transfer. We compare human choices with no-transfer, fully integrated meta-learning, and boundedly rational meta dynamic programming policies, BRMDP(D), where D is the number of hyper-posterior draws used to approximate integration. Trial-by-trial likelihood comparisons show that low-D policies, especially BRMDP(1), best predict participant choices. The results suggest that consumers transfer information across contexts using coarse representations of higher-order uncertainty.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); General Economics (econ.GN)

arXiv:2605.16532 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.16532v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16532 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage