aiqbench analysis
This study details a text-centric NLP approach using xlm-roberta-base to classify sexism intent in memes under the Learning with Disagreement paradigm. The team optimized performance by combining KL divergence for soft-label probability distributions and weighted cross-entropy for hard labels, achieving specific rankings in both evaluation tracks. Ablation analysis confirms that distinct loss functions are critical for balancing accuracy on definitive judgments against nuanced probabilistic assessments of annotator disagreement.
BioSentinel at EXIST 2026: Soft-Label Optimization with XLM-RoBERTa for Sexism Intent Classification in Memes
arXiv:2607.24137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper describes the BioSentinel team's participation in EXIST 2026 Task 2.2: Source Intention in Memes, part of the CLEF 2026 evaluation campaign. The task requires classifying the communicative intent behind memes as direct, judgemental, or no (non-sexist), under a Learning with Disagreement (Le-Wi-Di) paradigm that mandates both hard-label and soft-label (probability distribution) predictions. We present a text-centric approach built on xlm-roberta-base (270M parameters) trained with a composite loss function combining KL divergence on soft annotator distributions and weighted cross-entropy on hard labels. On the official test set, the system achieved an ICM-Soft-Norm of 0.3229 and ICM-Norm of 0.3778, with a hard F1-score of 0.4236, ranking 40th (out of 118 submissions) in the soft-soft evaluation and 49th (out of 187 submissions) in the hard-hard evaluation. We provide an analysis of the dataset characteristics, exploratory larger-architecture runs, and the role of annotator disagreement in shaping model design for subjective NLP tasks. Ablation results show that KL loss improves soft-label metrics, while CE loss improves hard-label accuracy. We also report a separate validation-set temperature analysis.
Abstract:This paper describes the BioSentinel team's participation in EXIST 2026 Task 2.2: Source Intention in Memes, part of the CLEF 2026 evaluation campaign. The task requires classifying the communicative intent behind memes as direct, judgemental, or no (non-sexist), under a Learning with Disagreement (Le-Wi-Di) paradigm that mandates both hard-label and soft-label (probability distribution) predictions. We present a text-centric approach built on xlm-roberta-base (270M parameters) trained with a composite loss function combining KL divergence on soft annotator distributions and weighted cross-entropy on hard labels. On the official test set, the system achieved an ICM-Soft-Norm of 0.3229 and ICM-Norm of 0.3778, with a hard F1-score of 0.4236, ranking 40th (out of 118 submissions) in the soft-soft evaluation and 49th (out of 187 submissions) in the hard-hard evaluation. We provide an analysis of the dataset characteristics, exploratory larger-architecture runs, and the role of annotator disagreement in shaping model design for subjective NLP tasks. Ablation results show that KL loss improves soft-label metrics, while CE loss improves hard-label accuracy. We also report a separate validation-set temperature analysis.
9 pages, 1 figure, 6 tables. Accepted for publication in the CLEF 2026 Working Notes (EXIST 2026), Jena, Germany
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.24137 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.24137v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24137 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 287 words
Related coverage
Through the Eyes of the Beholder: Biometric and Demographic Conditioning for Multimodal Sexism Detection
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026
Improving Topic Modeling by Distilling Soft Labels from Language Models
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026