aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that Large Language Models can effectively tailor machine translations to specific audience and intent when explicitly instructed, particularly in informal domains and for larger model sizes. The research reveals a critical gap where traditional evaluation metrics fail to assess this adaptability, often penalizing context-aware outputs, while also showing that models can self-generate necessary instructions from surrounding context to close most of the performance gap. These findings underscore the need for new, purpose-aware evaluation standards to accurately measure the evolving capabilities of generative translation systems.
Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent
arXiv:2606.03259v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Translation quality depends on purpose: the same source text demands different translations depending on audience, tone, and communicative intent. Yet MT models and metrics treat translation as a fixed mapping from source to target. LLMs enable users to explicitly specify purpose alongside source text, yet this capability has not been evaluated at scale. We introduce a systematic evaluation of purpose-driven MT across 50 languages, 5 model sizes and 8 text domains. We find that (1) explicit instructions substantially improve translation adaptedness, with larger gains on informal domains (conversation, social media), for larger model sizes and for higher-resource languages; (2) instructions outperform semantically-matched few-shot examples and paragraph-level context; (3) traditional MT metrics fail to capture adaptation quality, often penalizing adapted translations; (4) when curated instructions are unavailable, models can self-generate them from surrounding document context, closing up to 80% of the adaptedness gap to curated instructions. Our results establish that purpose-adapted MT is a viable and measurable capability of LLMs, while highlighting the need for purpose-aware metrics.
Abstract:Translation quality depends on purpose: the same source text demands different translations depending on audience, tone, and communicative intent. Yet MT models and metrics treat translation as a fixed mapping from source to target. LLMs enable users to explicitly specify purpose alongside source text, yet this capability has not been evaluated at scale. We introduce a systematic evaluation of purpose-driven MT across 50 languages, 5 model sizes and 8 text domains. We find that (1) explicit instructions substantially improve translation adaptedness, with larger gains on informal domains (conversation, social media), for larger model sizes and for higher-resource languages; (2) instructions outperform semantically-matched few-shot examples and paragraph-level context; (3) traditional MT metrics fail to capture adaptation quality, often penalizing adapted translations; (4) when curated instructions are unavailable, models can self-generate them from surrounding document context, closing up to 80% of the adaptedness gap to curated instructions. Our results establish that purpose-adapted MT is a viable and measurable capability of LLMs, while highlighting the need for purpose-aware metrics.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.03259 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.03259v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03259 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage
Beyond "To whom it may concern": Tailoring Machine Translation to Audience and Intent
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

"I am an AI Safety Researcher"
LessWrong · Sep 23, 2026

Berkeley Law report finds AI use affects rights in law, media, schools
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 29, 2026