aiqbench analysis
This paper addresses the critical challenge of safety in advanced robot control by introducing novel "safe sets" that relax strict control-invariance requirements while maintaining theoretical guarantees. The authors demonstrate through simulations and hardware experiments on a 6-joint manipulator that their MPC schemes reduce constraint violations without sacrificing tracking performance or computational efficiency. This work represents a significant methodological advance for integrating reinforcement learning and model predictive control into reliable robotic systems.
Beyond Terminal Constraints: Reliable Robot Control with Learned Safe Sets
arXiv:2611.06196v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Ensuring safety in advanced robot control methods such as Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Reinforcement Learning remains an open challenge. A common approach relies on control-invariant sets, yet their exact computation for nonlinear systems is generally intractable, and numerical approximations compromise theoretical guarantees. In this work, we show that safety does not need to rely exclusively on control invariance. We introduce novel classes of safe sets, each broader than classical control-invariant sets, and analyze corresponding MPC schemes that guarantee recursive feasibility by constraining different nodes of the prediction horizon rather than only the terminal state. Furthermore, when the safe set is an inner approximation of a suitable control-invariant set, our methods can ensure safety through a safe-abort strategy, even in the absence of recursive feasibility. We validate our approaches in extensive simulations on a 6-joint robot manipulator, showing fewer constraint violations than state-of-the-art methods while maintaining comparable tracking performance and computational efficiency. Hardware experiments further demonstrate the practicality of our schemes for real-world robotic applications.
Abstract:Ensuring safety in advanced robot control methods such as Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Reinforcement Learning remains an open challenge. A common approach relies on control-invariant sets, yet their exact computation for nonlinear systems is generally intractable, and numerical approximations compromise theoretical guarantees. In this work, we show that safety does not need to rely exclusively on control invariance. We introduce novel classes of safe sets, each broader than classical control-invariant sets, and analyze corresponding MPC schemes that guarantee recursive feasibility by constraining different nodes of the prediction horizon rather than only the terminal state. Furthermore, when the safe set is an inner approximation of a suitable control-invariant set, our methods can ensure safety through a safe-abort strategy, even in the absence of recursive feasibility. We validate our approaches in extensive simulations on a 6-joint robot manipulator, showing fewer constraint violations than state-of-the-art methods while maintaining comparable tracking performance and computational efficiency. Hardware experiments further demonstrate the practicality of our schemes for real-world robotic applications.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2611.06196 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2611.06196v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06196 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words
Related coverage
SDDBMs: Soft Denoising Diffusion Bridge Models
arXiv · Sep 29, 2026
ConicFlow: constrained Inference-time optimal control for flow matching models
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026

A modular approach to quantum control offers efficiency gains
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 30, 2026

GLM-5.3 Sometimes Considers How Train-Time Actions Shape Future Behavior
LessWrong · Oct 15, 2026