Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces ProMem, a framework that shifts memory extraction in LLM agents from passive summarization to a proactive process that separates details, events, and relations. By verifying facts at an atomic level before storage, the method significantly reduces hallucinations and improves question-answering accuracy while managing token costs efficiently. The work addresses critical gaps in how large language models manage long-term context for personalized interactions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Static Summarization: Proactive Memory Extraction for LLM Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.04463v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Memory management is vital for LLM agents in long-term and personalized interactions. Most previous work studies how to retrieve and use memory, but pays less attention to how memory is extracted. We find two main limitations in existing methods. First, extraction is "ahead-of-time": the agent saves information before it knows future tasks. A single summary prompt often mixes details, events, and relations, so useful information is lost. Second, extraction is usually one-off. Without verification, errors and hallucinations may stay in memory for a long time. To address these limitations, we propose ProMem, a proactive memory extraction framework. It separates details, events, and relations, and uses different extraction strategies for each type. It also checks completeness to recover missed events and verifies facts at the atomic level to reduce hallucinations. Experiments show that ProMem improves memory completeness and QA accuracy, while keeping a good balance between quality and token cost.

Abstract:Memory management is vital for LLM agents in long-term and personalized interactions. Most previous work studies how to retrieve and use memory, but pays less attention to how memory is extracted. We find two main limitations in existing methods. First, extraction is "ahead-of-time": the agent saves information before it knows future tasks. A single summary prompt often mixes details, events, and relations, so useful information is lost. Second, extraction is usually one-off. Without verification, errors and hallucinations may stay in memory for a long time. To address these limitations, we propose ProMem, a proactive memory extraction framework. It separates details, events, and relations, and uses different extraction strategies for each type. It also checks completeness to recover missed events and verifies facts at the atomic level to reduce hallucinations. Experiments show that ProMem improves memory completeness and QA accuracy, while keeping a good balance between quality and token cost.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2601.04463 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2601.04463v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.04463 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage