Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates that integrating LLM reasoning into retrieval loops significantly outperforms standard dense methods on complex tasks, offering a viable path for agentic workflows despite substantial latency and token consumption. The findings highlight a critical trade-off between improved nDCG scores and operational costs, suggesting that current agentic retrieval strategies may require optimization before large-scale deployment.
Sources coveringarXiv, InfoQ, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Semantic Similarity: Performance and Costs of Agentic Retrieval for Complex Tasks

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.05750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern information systems, including many agentic workflows, use dense retrieval to explore large amounts of unstructured data. However, dense retrieval relies on surface-level semantic similarity, which is insufficient for increasingly complex search applications. Here, we investigate agentic retrieval that combines the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the efficient corpus exploration of retrievers in a ReAct agentic loop to solve complex retrieval tasks. In our experiments, we show that agentic retrieval is more effective than standard retrieval, improving nDCG@10 by 8.7 points using the same embedding model. Moreover, while specialized retrieval methods struggle on out-of-domain tasks, agentic retrieval is highly generalizable: the same pipeline achieves competitive results on both the ViDoRe v3 and BRIGHT leaderboards. However, this improvement comes at a cost. On average, agentic retrieval takes 107.4 seconds, compared to 0.67 seconds for standard retrieval, and consumes 764.1K input and 5.8K output tokens per query. In short, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of agentic retrieval in modern data systems and motivates future work on more cost-efficient retrieval agents for large-scale deployment.

Authors:Reza Esfandiarpoor, Radek Osmulski, Yauhen Babakhin, Gabriel de Souza P. Moreira, Oliver Holworthy, Jie He, Ronay Ak, Jiarui Cai, Ryan Chesler, Bo Liu, Even Oldridge

Abstract:Modern information systems, including many agentic workflows, use dense retrieval to explore large amounts of unstructured data. However, dense retrieval relies on surface-level semantic similarity, which is insufficient for increasingly complex search applications. Here, we investigate agentic retrieval that combines the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the efficient corpus exploration of retrievers in a ReAct agentic loop to solve complex retrieval tasks. In our experiments, we show that agentic retrieval is more effective than standard retrieval, improving nDCG@10 by 8.7 points using the same embedding model. Moreover, while specialized retrieval methods struggle on out-of-domain tasks, agentic retrieval is highly generalizable: the same pipeline achieves competitive results on both the ViDoRe v3 and BRIGHT leaderboards. However, this improvement comes at a cost. On average, agentic retrieval takes 107.4 seconds, compared to 0.67 seconds for standard retrieval, and consumes 764.1K input and 5.8K output tokens per query. In short, our study demonstrates the effectiveness of agentic retrieval in modern data systems and motivates future work on more cost-efficient retrieval agents for large-scale deployment.

Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.05750 [cs.IR]

(or arXiv:2610.05750v1 [cs.IR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05750 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words

Related coverage