aiqbench analysis
This research advances the theoretical understanding of adversarial attacks on multi-armed bandit algorithms, specifically demonstrating that directly promoting target items is mathematically necessary for optimal-cost attacks under certain reward conditions. By extending these findings to Thompson Sampling and other exploration strategies, the work provides critical insights into the vulnerabilities of recommendation systems and online learning models against manipulation tactics like fake reviews.
Beyond Reward Suppression: Near-Optimal Offline Attacks on Warm-Start Bandits with Bounded Rewards
arXiv:2610.10000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adversarial attacks on bandits aim to mislead a learner toward a target arm while keeping the attack cost small. Existing attacks typically achieve this by suppressing non-target arms. In practice, however, manipulation such as fake reviews often directly promotes the target item. We study this gap through bounded offline attacks on warm-start bandits, where an attacker can inject only valid action-reward pairs into the warm-start history before deployment. We show that target promotion is not merely a heuristic: when the target arm lies near the lower reward boundary, any order-optimal-cost attack against UCB that makes it selected in nearly all online rounds must allocate a nonvanishing fraction of its cost to the target arm. We then design an attack that achieves the optimal sublinear cost and characterize its allocation between target promotion and non-target suppression. We further extend the attack to Thompson Sampling, $\epsilon$-greedy, and a broader class of bandit algorithms. Experiments on real-world and synthetic data validate the effectiveness of our attacks.
Abstract:Adversarial attacks on bandits aim to mislead a learner toward a target arm while keeping the attack cost small. Existing attacks typically achieve this by suppressing non-target arms. In practice, however, manipulation such as fake reviews often directly promotes the target item. We study this gap through bounded offline attacks on warm-start bandits, where an attacker can inject only valid action-reward pairs into the warm-start history before deployment. We show that target promotion is not merely a heuristic: when the target arm lies near the lower reward boundary, any order-optimal-cost attack against UCB that makes it selected in nearly all online rounds must allocate a nonvanishing fraction of its cost to the target arm. We then design an attack that achieves the optimal sublinear cost and characterize its allocation between target promotion and non-target suppression. We further extend the attack to Thompson Sampling, $\epsilon$-greedy, and a broader class of bandit algorithms. Experiments on real-world and synthetic data validate the effectiveness of our attacks.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.10000 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.10000v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10000 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 260 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026