Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the "one-epoch phenomenon" in recommendation systems, where training beyond a single epoch degrades generalization due to self-influence asymmetry in shared consumer embeddings. The authors propose uncertainty-weighted sensitivity regularization (UWSR) to penalize reliance on uncertain embeddings, successfully improving test cross-entropy and AUC across multiple benchmarks while preserving learned representations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond One Epoch: Uncertainty-Weighted Sensitivity Regularization for Recommendation Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.34083v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recommendation models with sparse embeddings and a shared consumer often exhibit the one-epoch phenomenon: a second epoch lowers training loss while sharply degrading generalization. We present a view based on the violation of the prequential principle. On the first epoch, an example's label has not affected the embedding rows used to score it. On later epochs, those rows contain a displacement induced by the labels earlier update. This creates an incentive for the shared consumer to exploit this displacement in subsequent epochs, which fails to generalize. We call this self-influence asymmetry. Using an exact scalar model and local influence analysis, we connect this mismatch to the uncertainty in the embeddings and the consumers incentive to exploit it in subsequent epochs. We verify this hypothesis using an embedding-consumer-update interventions in deep recommendation models and propose uncertainty-weighted sensitivity regularization (UWSR) which counteracts this mismatch by augmenting the loss function to penalize the consumer for relying on uncertain embeddings. Unlike existing remedies, UWSR preserves the learned embeddings and across three benchmarks, four-epoch UWSR reduces test cross-entropy by 1.38%-6.78% and improves AUC by 0.0058-0.0231 relative to one-epoch training.

Abstract:Recommendation models with sparse embeddings and a shared consumer often exhibit the one-epoch phenomenon: a second epoch lowers training loss while sharply degrading generalization. We present a view based on the violation of the prequential principle. On the first epoch, an example's label has not affected the embedding rows used to score it. On later epochs, those rows contain a displacement induced by the labels earlier update. This creates an incentive for the shared consumer to exploit this displacement in subsequent epochs, which fails to generalize. We call this self-influence asymmetry. Using an exact scalar model and local influence analysis, we connect this mismatch to the uncertainty in the embeddings and the consumers incentive to exploit it in subsequent epochs. We verify this hypothesis using an embedding-consumer-update interventions in deep recommendation models and propose uncertainty-weighted sensitivity regularization (UWSR) which counteracts this mismatch by augmenting the loss function to penalize the consumer for relying on uncertain embeddings. Unlike existing remedies, UWSR preserves the learned embeddings and across three benchmarks, four-epoch UWSR reduces test cross-entropy by 1.38%-6.78% and improves AUC by 0.0058-0.0231 relative to one-epoch training.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.34083 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.34083v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34083 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage