Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical gap in neutral-atom quantum compilation by demonstrating that geometrically legal qubit spacing does not eliminate residual van der Waals coupling, which can still corrupt logical operations even after error correction. The study reveals that modest increases in inter-qubit distance significantly suppress this correlated noise exposure without imposing simple linear timing penalties, thereby challenging current compiler heuristics that prioritize maximum parallelism over physical reliability. These findings advocate for a cross-layer optimization approach where spacing decisions explicitly account for both hardware geometry and QEC absorption costs to improve overall system fidelity.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Legal Spacing: A Residual-Aware Characterization of Entangling-Zone Spacing in Neutral-Atom Compilation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.17331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neutral-atom processors rely on spatially arranged qubit arrays and parallel Rydberg entangling gates for scalable execution. Their compilers enforce geometric spacing rules for simultaneous gates, yet legal separation does not make residual van der Waals coupling disappear. This paper studies that gap between geometric legality and residual noise by treating entangling-zone spacing as a cross-layer reliability-parallelism variable anchored to experimental neutral-atom geometry. We combine fixed-schedule residual replay, surface-code simulation with matched correlated decoding, and fresh recompilation to connect spacing to physical residual exposure, logical reliability, and makespan cost. The results show that near-floor spacing can produce structured correlated exposure that is visible both at the physical layer and, in the tightest case, after quantum error correction (QEC). Modest geometric slack strongly suppresses this residual contribution, but the timing cost of looser spacing is mediated by placement and scheduling rather than by a simple monotonic slowdown. These findings distinguish hardware legality from residual-noise safety and motivate spacing-aware compiler evaluations that report physical geometry, QEC absorption, and scheduling cost together.

Abstract:Neutral-atom processors rely on spatially arranged qubit arrays and parallel Rydberg entangling gates for scalable execution. Their compilers enforce geometric spacing rules for simultaneous gates, yet legal separation does not make residual van der Waals coupling disappear. This paper studies that gap between geometric legality and residual noise by treating entangling-zone spacing as a cross-layer reliability-parallelism variable anchored to experimental neutral-atom geometry. We combine fixed-schedule residual replay, surface-code simulation with matched correlated decoding, and fresh recompilation to connect spacing to physical residual exposure, logical reliability, and makespan cost. The results show that near-floor spacing can produce structured correlated exposure that is visible both at the physical layer and, in the tightest case, after quantum error correction (QEC). Modest geometric slack strongly suppresses this residual contribution, but the timing cost of looser spacing is mediated by placement and scheduling rather than by a simple monotonic slowdown. These findings distinguish hardware legality from residual-noise safety and motivate spacing-aware compiler evaluations that report physical geometry, QEC absorption, and scheduling cost together.

Accepted at IEEE QCE 2026. 4 pages, 6 figures

arXiv:2608.17331 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.17331v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17331 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 268 words

Related coverage