Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This paper offers a rigorous methodological analysis of feature fusion in medical imaging models, distinguishing between structural gate weights and actual decision-level contributions at the classifier output. By decomposing the logit in a linear head architecture, it reveals significant discrepancies where gated image terms retain stronger discriminative power than direct radiomics terms, challenging standard interpretability assumptions. These findings are critical for researchers developing explainable AI systems that rely on multi-modal feature integration to ensure accurate attribution of model decisions.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Gate Weights: Decision-Level Interpretation of Radiomics-Image Feature Fusion for RCC Classification

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.14152v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gate coefficients describe how a fusion layer weights intermediate features, but they do not necessarily reflect the magnitude of branch contributions at the classifier output. We investigate this distinction in a fixed 3D MedVAE--radiomics model for clear cell versus non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma classification from contrast-enhanced CT. Because the model uses a linear classification head, the binary decision logit can be decomposed exactly into a gated image term, a direct radiomics term, and a bias. We define effective radiomics dominance as the direct radiomics term's share of the summed absolute non-bias branch contributions and compare it with structural radiomics weighting. Internally, mean structural radiomics weighting was 0.823, whereas mean effective radiomics dominance was 0.148, with a modest case-wise association (\r{ho} = 0.290). The gated image term retained substantially stronger discriminative ranking information than the direct radiomics term. The same structural-to-effective discrepancy was observed in exploratory external evaluation. Branch-targeted permutation, integrated-gradient, and Shapley-style analyses further identified radiomics descriptors influencing the direct radiomics term. Because radiomics also generates the gate, the gated image term remains radiomics-dependent, so additive branch contribution should not be interpreted as total input influence. These findings show that structural gate weighting and decision-level branch contribution represent distinct aspects of gated feature fusion and should be interpreted separately.

Abstract:Gate coefficients describe how a fusion layer weights intermediate features, but they do not necessarily reflect the magnitude of branch contributions at the classifier output. We investigate this distinction in a fixed 3D MedVAE--radiomics model for clear cell versus non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma classification from contrast-enhanced CT. Because the model uses a linear classification head, the binary decision logit can be decomposed exactly into a gated image term, a direct radiomics term, and a bias. We define effective radiomics dominance as the direct radiomics term's share of the summed absolute non-bias branch contributions and compare it with structural radiomics weighting. Internally, mean structural radiomics weighting was 0.823, whereas mean effective radiomics dominance was 0.148, with a modest case-wise association (\r{ho} = 0.290). The gated image term retained substantially stronger discriminative ranking information than the direct radiomics term. The same structural-to-effective discrepancy was observed in exploratory external evaluation. Branch-targeted permutation, integrated-gradient, and Shapley-style analyses further identified radiomics descriptors influencing the direct radiomics term. Because radiomics also generates the gate, the gated image term remains radiomics-dependent, so additive branch contribution should not be interpreted as total input influence. These findings show that structural gate weighting and decision-level branch contribution represent distinct aspects of gated feature fusion and should be interpreted separately.

12 pages, 1 figure. Accepted at the 2026 Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science (AICS 2026). Proceedings forthcoming

Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2610.14152 [eess.IV]

(or arXiv:2610.14152v1 [eess.IV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14152 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 335 words

Related coverage