aiqbench analysis
This research investigates whether contextual embeddings can effectively track semantic shifts in scientific terminology that frequency-based methods miss. The study finds that while frequency metrics slightly outperform embeddings in identifying trend-related terms, embedding analysis uniquely captures critical conceptual developments like "primordial black holes." Consequently, integrating both approaches offers a more robust framework for scientometric trend analysis than relying on word counts alone.
Beyond frequency measures: Can contextual embeddings capture meaning change in scientific texts?
arXiv:2609.18804v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying technological trends is a core scientometric task, yet traditional frequency-based approaches struggle to capture substantial meaning shifts of domain-specific terms. We hypothesise that contextual embeddings can complement frequency dynamics to effectively track diachronic semantic change. We compare frequency and embedding-based approaches across Astrophysics and NLP corpora spanning from 2010 to 2024. Candidate terms are extracted using KeyBERT (utilizing SciBERT as its underlying language model) and filtered for significant frequency increases using Fisher's exact test. These terms are then evaluated for genuine semantic shift by domain experts to establish ground-truth labels. To quantify semantic drift, each term's contextual embedding ''clouds'' from the two discrete periods are compared using multiple metrics: cosine distance, average pairwise distance, Hotelling-type T 2 , and maximum mean discrepancy. Results indicate that frequency-based methods align slightly better with human judgments of ''trend-related terms'' than semantic metrics (Precision@50 of 0.62 vs 0.60 in Astrophysics). The two signals show a correlation of around 0.6. Several terms identified exclusively by embedding metrics (e.g., ''primordial black holes'') represent critical conceptual developments invisible to pure frequency analysis. These findings indicate that semantic metrics may capture complementary information, highlighting the value of integrating contextual embeddings into scientometric trend analysis.
Title:Beyond frequency measures: Can contextual embeddings capture meaning change in scientific texts?
Abstract:Identifying technological trends is a core scientometric task, yet traditional frequency-based approaches struggle to capture substantial meaning shifts of domain-specific terms. We hypothesise that contextual embeddings can complement frequency dynamics to effectively track diachronic semantic change. We compare frequency and embedding-based approaches across Astrophysics and NLP corpora spanning from 2010 to 2024. Candidate terms are extracted using KeyBERT (utilizing SciBERT as its underlying language model) and filtered for significant frequency increases using Fisher's exact test. These terms are then evaluated for genuine semantic shift by domain experts to establish ground-truth labels. To quantify semantic drift, each term's contextual embedding ''clouds'' from the two discrete periods are compared using multiple metrics: cosine distance, average pairwise distance, Hotelling-type T 2 , and maximum mean discrepancy. Results indicate that frequency-based methods align slightly better with human judgments of ''trend-related terms'' than semantic metrics (Precision@50 of 0.62 vs 0.60 in Astrophysics). The two signals show a correlation of around 0.6. Several terms identified exclusively by embedding metrics (e.g., ''primordial black holes'') represent critical conceptual developments invisible to pure frequency analysis. These findings indicate that semantic metrics may capture complementary information, highlighting the value of integrating contextual embeddings into scientometric trend analysis.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.18804 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.18804v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18804 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
18th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (JADT 2026), Jul 2026, Palermo, Italy. pp.232-241
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

AI-powered metadata correction and harmonization
AWS · Aug 24, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Artmarket.com: H1 2026 Financial Report -- One-of-a - Kind AI Systems Intuitive Artmarket and Blind Spot Will Drive the Next Phase of Growth for
australiannews.net · Sep 29, 2026