Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study challenges the assumption that reasoning and memorization in LLMs rely on fixed representation directions, demonstrating that while these capabilities remain decodable as single dimensions, their geometric orientation shifts significantly after reinforcement learning. The findings highlight a critical distinction between information persistence and geometric stability, offering new insights into how model representations evolve during training optimization.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Fixed Directions: Adaptive Representation Analysis of Reasoning and Memorization in LLMs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.21919v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work has proposed that reasoning and memorization in language models can be characterized by a single representation direction, including methods that keep this direction fixed during reinforcement learning. We test two assumptions behind this view. First, are reasoning-oriented and factual-recall task groups approximately single-direction separable? Second, does the resulting geometry remain stable after GRPO? Using Qwen3-0.6B and a controlled 400-example dataset, we find that a one-dimensional projection can match a full 1024-dimensional linear probe with AUROC = 1.00 on the studied task groups. However, after GRPO, the corresponding direction is substantially reorganized: mean-direction cosine averages 0.453, probe-direction cosine 0.445, while direct representation drift reaches 0.511 at the final layer. Probe AUROC nevertheless remains 1.00. The evidence therefore supports single-direction decodability for the studied task groups but challenges fixed-direction stability: the information persists while its geometric realization changes.

Abstract:Recent work has proposed that reasoning and memorization in language models can be characterized by a single representation direction, including methods that keep this direction fixed during reinforcement learning. We test two assumptions behind this view. First, are reasoning-oriented and factual-recall task groups approximately single-direction separable? Second, does the resulting geometry remain stable after GRPO? Using Qwen3-0.6B and a controlled 400-example dataset, we find that a one-dimensional projection can match a full 1024-dimensional linear probe with AUROC = 1.00 on the studied task groups. However, after GRPO, the corresponding direction is substantially reorganized: mean-direction cosine averages 0.453, probe-direction cosine 0.445, while direct representation drift reaches 0.511 at the final layer. Probe AUROC nevertheless remains 1.00. The evidence therefore supports single-direction decodability for the studied task groups but challenges fixed-direction stability: the information persists while its geometric realization changes.

Preprint. Code and experimental resources are available on GitHub

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.21919 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.21919v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21919 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words

Related coverage