Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces PRISM, a unified framework that optimizes Large Language Model serving by simultaneously addressing energy, carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts rather than evaluating them in isolation. The study demonstrates that while computing configurations primarily dictate energy use, deployment location and timing critically influence environmental footprints like carbon emissions and water consumption. By balancing these four dimensions, the proposed method significantly reduces worst-case regret compared to standard baselines, offering a concrete path toward sustainable AI infrastructure.
Sources coveringarXiv, The Quantum Insider, AWS
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Energy: When Sustainability Dimensions Reshape LLM Serving Decisions

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.35569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) serving has environmental impacts across energy consumption, carbon emission, water consumption, and biodiversity loss. Yet these dimensions are largely evaluated in isolation, leaving it unclear when and how they lead to different optimization decisions. We present PRISM, a unified framework for characterizing and optimizing LLM serving across energy, carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts. Our analysis reveals a fundamental distinction: computing configurations determine energy consumption, whereas where and when LLM serving is deployed determine its carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts. Under a fixed deployment choice and operational-only accounting, all dimensions preserve the same energy-based configuration ranking. Deployment rankings can diverge across dimensions, while embodied impacts can break configuration invariance when they exceed a lifecycle crossover boundary. PRISM identifies these conditions, quantifies cross-dimensional regrets, and balances the four dimensions. In regional-routing experiments, PRISM reduces median worst-case regret by 50.2% relative to the strongest baseline.

Abstract:Large language model (LLM) serving has environmental impacts across energy consumption, carbon emission, water consumption, and biodiversity loss. Yet these dimensions are largely evaluated in isolation, leaving it unclear when and how they lead to different optimization decisions. We present PRISM, a unified framework for characterizing and optimizing LLM serving across energy, carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts. Our analysis reveals a fundamental distinction: computing configurations determine energy consumption, whereas where and when LLM serving is deployed determine its carbon, water, and biodiversity impacts. Under a fixed deployment choice and operational-only accounting, all dimensions preserve the same energy-based configuration ranking. Deployment rankings can diverge across dimensions, while embodied impacts can break configuration invariance when they exceed a lifecycle crossover boundary. PRISM identifies these conditions, quantifies cross-dimensional regrets, and balances the four dimensions. In regional-routing experiments, PRISM reduces median worst-case regret by 50.2% relative to the strongest baseline.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Performance (cs.PF)

arXiv:2609.35569 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2609.35569v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.35569 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage