aiqbench analysis
This research introduces the "Intentional Agent" framework, which replaces direct stimulus-response mapping with a structured internal-state process to generate more cognitively plausible facial reactions in human-computer interaction. By modeling temporal internal dynamics and emotional drives, the approach significantly outperforms heuristic baselines while maintaining high perceptual plausibility according to blinded human evaluations. This work advances the field of affective computing by demonstrating how explicit intermediate states can bridge abstract thought flows with physiological expressions for more autonomous agents.
Beyond End-to-End Black Box Mapping: An Intentional Agent Framework for Cognitive-driven Facial Reaction Generation
arXiv:2609.34419v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automatic human-like facial reaction generation (FRG) is essential for building intelligent systems that can engage in human-computer interaction (HCI). While diverse and context-appropriate facial reactions can reflect latent appraisal and affective processes in human interaction, most existing FRG methods rely on end-to-end architectures that directly map speaker behaviours to listener expressions without an explicit intermediate internal state. We reformulate FRG as generation mediated by a structured internal-state process and propose the \textbf{Intentional Agent}, which shifts FRG from direct stimulus-response mapping to stimulus-grounded generation through explicit intermediate states. To represent temporal internal-state evolution, we propose an internal dynamics model that integrates emotional drives with an iterative Inner Thought Flow (ITF) within a structured intermediate state used for subsequent generation. This state can continue to update during conversational silences. Furthermore, to bridge abstract internal states with physiological actions, we formulate FRG as a downstream affective mapping from this latent thought flow to facial expressions. Experiments on the REACT 2025 dataset show an FRDist of 72.39 and an FRDiv of 0.5057; perceptual plausibility is evaluated separately through blinded human ratings. A blinded human evaluation of 96 reactions found no significant difference in mean score between Full and ground truth ($5.527$ vs.\ $5.195$, $p_{\mathrm{Holm}}=.076$), while Full significantly outperformed Event-Triggered and Heuristic-Only (both $p_{\mathrm{Holm}}<.001$). The Reaction Quality Scorer (RQS) correlated strongly with human judgements (Pearson $r=.855$; Spearman $\rho=.821$, both $p<.05$), supporting its use as an automatic metric. These results underscore the immense potential of endogenous dynamics in building highly autonomous, human-like agents.
Abstract:Automatic human-like facial reaction generation (FRG) is essential for building intelligent systems that can engage in human-computer interaction (HCI). While diverse and context-appropriate facial reactions can reflect latent appraisal and affective processes in human interaction, most existing FRG methods rely on end-to-end architectures that directly map speaker behaviours to listener expressions without an explicit intermediate internal state. We reformulate FRG as generation mediated by a structured internal-state process and propose the \textbf{Intentional Agent}, which shifts FRG from direct stimulus-response mapping to stimulus-grounded generation through explicit intermediate states. To represent temporal internal-state evolution, we propose an internal dynamics model that integrates emotional drives with an iterative Inner Thought Flow (ITF) within a structured intermediate state used for subsequent generation. This state can continue to update during conversational silences. Furthermore, to bridge abstract internal states with physiological actions, we formulate FRG as a downstream affective mapping from this latent thought flow to facial expressions. Experiments on the REACT 2025 dataset show an FRDist of 72.39 and an FRDiv of 0.5057; perceptual plausibility is evaluated separately through blinded human ratings. A blinded human evaluation of 96 reactions found no significant difference in mean score between Full and ground truth ($5.527$ vs.\ $5.195$, $p_{\mathrm{Holm}}=.076$), while Full significantly outperformed Event-Triggered and Heuristic-Only (both $p_{\mathrm{Holm}}<.001$). The Reaction Quality Scorer (RQS) correlated strongly with human judgements (Pearson $r=.855$; Spearman $\rho=.821$, both $p<.05$), supporting its use as an automatic metric. These results underscore the immense potential of endogenous dynamics in building highly autonomous, human-like agents.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
I.2.11; I.2.0; H.5.2
arXiv:2609.34419 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.34419v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34419 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 344 words
Related coverage

Mastering Agentic Techniques: AI Agent Evaluation
NVIDIA · May 19, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026

Databricks joins the Open Secure AI Alliance to advance AI safety and security
Databricks · Aug 4, 2026