aiqbench analysis
This research introduces an "Encoding Probe" method that reconstructs internal representations of text and speech transformer models using interpretable features, addressing key limitations in standard decoding approaches regarding feature comparison and correlation effects. By demonstrating that syntactic and lexical features contribute independently to reconstruction while speaker identity varies by training objective, the study offers a novel framework for interpreting model internals beyond simple decodability metrics.
Beyond Decodability: Reconstructing Language Model Representations with an Encoding Probe
arXiv:2605.00607v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Probing is widely used to study which features can be decoded from language model representations. However, the common decoding probe approach has two limitations that we aim to solve with our new encoding probe approach: contributions of different features to model representations cannot be directly compared, and feature correlations can affect probing results. We present an Encoding Probe that reverses this direction and reconstructs internal representations of models using interpretable features. We evaluate this method on text and speech transformer models, using feature sets spanning acoustics, phonetics, syntax, lexicon, and speaker identity. Our results suggest that speaker-related effects vary strongly across different training objectives and datasets, while syntactic and lexical features contribute independently to reconstruction. These results show that the Encoding Probe provides a complementary perspective on interpreting model representations beyond decodability.
Abstract:Probing is widely used to study which features can be decoded from language model representations. However, the common decoding probe approach has two limitations that we aim to solve with our new encoding probe approach: contributions of different features to model representations cannot be directly compared, and feature correlations can affect probing results. We present an Encoding Probe that reverses this direction and reconstructs internal representations of models using interpretable features. We evaluate this method on text and speech transformer models, using feature sets spanning acoustics, phonetics, syntax, lexicon, and speaker identity. Our results suggest that speaker-related effects vary strongly across different training objectives and datasets, while syntactic and lexical features contribute independently to reconstruction. These results show that the Encoding Probe provides a complementary perspective on interpreting model representations beyond decodability.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2605.00607 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.00607v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00607 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 230 words
Related coverage
Interaction Latents as Actions for Contact-Rich Manipulation
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
X-Tokenizer: A Multimodal Action Tokenizer for Vision-Language-Action Pretraining
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026

How do neural networks regress cubic polynomials? Apparently, they use a trick invented in Milan 500 years ago
LessWrong · Jul 22, 2026