Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a lightweight latency estimator for large language model routers, addressing the critical gap where current systems ignore generation delays in favor of just cost or accuracy. By jointly optimizing time-to-first-token (TTFT), inference quality, and monetary expense during dynamic workloads, this approach achieves significant utility improvements without sacrificing speed. The findings are vital for engineers building scalable LLM serving infrastructures that must balance multiple performance metrics simultaneously.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Beyond Accuracy and Cost: Latency-Aware LLM Query Routing for Dynamic Workloads

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.18253v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern language query routers improve inference efficiency by assigning each query to a model that balances response quality and monetary cost. However, current query routers are largely latency-agnostic and do not consider the generation latency experienced by queries at model instances. In practice, latency is often controlled by load-balancing policies such as round-robin or join-the-shortest-queue, which do not account for model accuracy or inference cost. Incorporating query latency into routing is challenging as it depends not only on the query's prompt length, but also on the current prefill and decode workload at the model instance and the scheduling and batching policy of the serving framework. We design a lightweight latency estimator that simulates autoregressive token batch processing in the serving framework and estimates the time-to-first-token (TTFT) of queries. We incorporate this latency estimator into a latency-aware router that jointly optimizes latency, accuracy, and cost when assigning queries to model instances. Our experimental results indicate that this joint optimization yields up to 40% improvement in accuracy--cost utility while maintaining the same latencies as standard load-balancing approaches.

Abstract:Modern language query routers improve inference efficiency by assigning each query to a model that balances response quality and monetary cost. However, current query routers are largely latency-agnostic and do not consider the generation latency experienced by queries at model instances. In practice, latency is often controlled by load-balancing policies such as round-robin or join-the-shortest-queue, which do not account for model accuracy or inference cost. Incorporating query latency into routing is challenging as it depends not only on the query's prompt length, but also on the current prefill and decode workload at the model instance and the scheduling and batching policy of the serving framework. We design a lightweight latency estimator that simulates autoregressive token batch processing in the serving framework and estimates the time-to-first-token (TTFT) of queries. We incorporate this latency estimator into a latency-aware router that jointly optimizes latency, accuracy, and cost when assigning queries to model instances. Our experimental results indicate that this joint optimization yields up to 40% improvement in accuracy--cost utility while maintaining the same latencies as standard load-balancing approaches.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2607.18253 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.18253v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18253 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words

Related coverage