aiqbench analysis
This study offers a critical qualitative assessment of how leading vision-language models handle context-dependent hate speech in memes, revealing significant limitations in interpreting irony and subtle social cues. By moving beyond standard accuracy metrics to analyze model justifications, the research provides essential insights into the reasoning constraints of current VLMs when facing complex multimodal tasks.
Beyond Accuracy: A Qualitative Analysis of Vision-Language Models for Hate Speech Detection in Memes
arXiv:2608.26143v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Memes have turned out to be a powerful tool through which individuals share their ideas concerning contemporary social and political problems. Their anonymity, as well as their ability to go viral, make them a powerful medium for spreading hate. It remains very difficult to identify such complex and context-dependent hate speech. Although they display excellent performance on multimodal tasks, vision-language models (VLMs) tend to ignore context, irony, and other subtle cues that play a key role in identifying hateful memes. In this work, we present a qualitative analysis of four state-of-the-art VLMs: LLaVA-7B, Qwen-VL, GPT-4o mini, and Claude 3 Haiku. We evaluate these models under zero-shot and few-shot prompting to examine how contextual framing influences their outputs. Our analysis goes beyond simple classification accuracy and focuses on a qualitative evaluation of the models' generated justifications, providing a more in-depth understanding of their thought processes and constraints when dealing with hateful memes.
Abstract:Memes have turned out to be a powerful tool through which individuals share their ideas concerning contemporary social and political problems. Their anonymity, as well as their ability to go viral, make them a powerful medium for spreading hate. It remains very difficult to identify such complex and context-dependent hate speech. Although they display excellent performance on multimodal tasks, vision-language models (VLMs) tend to ignore context, irony, and other subtle cues that play a key role in identifying hateful memes. In this work, we present a qualitative analysis of four state-of-the-art VLMs: LLaVA-7B, Qwen-VL, GPT-4o mini, and Claude 3 Haiku. We evaluate these models under zero-shot and few-shot prompting to examine how contextual framing influences their outputs. Our analysis goes beyond simple classification accuracy and focuses on a qualitative evaluation of the models' generated justifications, providing a more in-depth understanding of their thought processes and constraints when dealing with hateful memes.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.26143 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.26143v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26143 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words
Related coverage

[AINews] The Future of Latent Space
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026
When Low CER is Not Enough: An Analysis of Hallucinations in Vision-Language OCR Systems on Historical Uruguayan Documents
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026