Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This benchmarking study provides critical performance data on GPU-accelerated quantum simulators, demonstrating significant speedups over CPU-based methods for large-scale problems like IBM's 127-qubit kicked Ising model. The findings highlight that hosted environments and specific simulation techniques are now essential for achieving high accuracy regimes previously inaccessible to commodity hardware. By offering reproducible code and configurations, the research establishes a transparent baseline for evaluating scalability in approximate quantum simulation workflows.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Benchmarking Zero-Setup Quantum Circuit Simulators

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.09882v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Practitioners increasingly rely on hosted simulation environments, but their performance characteristics remain poorly documented. We present a systematic benchmarking study of GPU-accelerated approximate quantum simulation across two widely used methods: matrix product states (MPS) and Pauli path simulation (PPS), comparing BlueQubit (a hosted tool that handles hardware provisioning, simulator configuration, and job orchestration) against AWS Braket, Quantum Rings, PPS-Qiskit, and PauliPropagation.jl. For MPS, we find that GPU runtime yields sub-quadratic scaling with bond dimension, with a growing advantage over CPU at increasing scale. For Pauli path simulation on IBM's 127-qubit kicked Ising benchmark, GPUs deliver up to $1{,}400\times$ speedup at fine truncation thresholds ($\delta = 2.5 \times 10^{-5}$, 27.6M Pauli terms), and are the only backends that reach accuracy regimes below $\delta = 10^{-5}$, which remained inaccessible to the commodity CPU-based implementations and self-contained SDKs evaluated here. We also provide a reproducible characterization of these simulators across regimes, including tradeoffs that isolated evaluations do not show. To support transparency and reuse, we provide a public GitHub repository containing all benchmarking code and configurations.

Abstract:Practitioners increasingly rely on hosted simulation environments, but their performance characteristics remain poorly documented. We present a systematic benchmarking study of GPU-accelerated approximate quantum simulation across two widely used methods: matrix product states (MPS) and Pauli path simulation (PPS), comparing BlueQubit (a hosted tool that handles hardware provisioning, simulator configuration, and job orchestration) against AWS Braket, Quantum Rings, PPS-Qiskit, and this http URL. For MPS, we find that GPU runtime yields sub-quadratic scaling with bond dimension, with a growing advantage over CPU at increasing scale. For Pauli path simulation on IBM's 127-qubit kicked Ising benchmark, GPUs deliver up to $1{,}400\times$ speedup at fine truncation thresholds ($\delta = 2.5 \times 10^{-5}$, 27.6M Pauli terms), and are the only backends that reach accuracy regimes below $\delta = 10^{-5}$, which remained inaccessible to the commodity CPU-based implementations and self-contained SDKs evaluated here. We also provide a reproducible characterization of these simulators across regimes, including tradeoffs that isolated evaluations do not show. To support transparency and reuse, we provide a public GitHub repository containing all benchmarking code and configurations.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Performance (cs.PF)

arXiv:2607.09882 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2607.09882v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.09882 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words

Related coverage