aiqbench analysis
This arXiv paper introduces HSC-Bench, a benchmark for measuring how well a receiving AI agent continues work from a previous agent's handoff state, covering both repository evidence recovery and continuation from conversational, tool, and file state. Its main finding is that rankings based on evidence recovery don't predict continuation performance, so the strongest receiving model can differ depending on the track. For readers building multi-agent systems, the practical point is that handoff quality needs to be evaluated on what the receiver does next, not only on whether it can retrieve prior information.
Benchmarking Task Takeover Across Agent Handoffs
arXiv:2610.36523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As agents collaborate on longer tasks, responsibility may pass between models before the work is complete. The receiving model must build on prior decisions, observations, and actions while addressing the remaining requirements. Evaluating this transition requires connecting the information preserved at handoff to how the receiver continues the work, a relationship that task-success and memory-retention scores alone do not capture. We introduce the Handoff State Continuity Benchmark (HSC-Bench), comprising 1,039 tasks that evaluate two complementary aspects of task takeover: recovering relevant repository evidence and continuing from established conversational, tool, and file-work state. Comparisons across six receiving models show that structured handoff state improves repository evidence recovery for every model and continuation performance for most models. The strongest receivers differ between the two tracks, showing that evidence-recovery rankings alone do not characterize performance when continuing from inherited state. By combining these comparisons with checks of subsequent responses and actions, HSC-Bench evaluates both access to prior evidence and adherence to established commitments and completed work. This provides a basis for selecting receiving models and assessing handoff representations according to the work that must be carried forward.
Abstract:As agents collaborate on longer tasks, responsibility may pass between models before the work is complete. The receiving model must build on prior decisions, observations, and actions while addressing the remaining requirements. Evaluating this transition requires connecting the information preserved at handoff to how the receiver continues the work, a relationship that task-success and memory-retention scores alone do not capture. We introduce the Handoff State Continuity Benchmark (HSC-Bench), comprising 1,039 tasks that evaluate two complementary aspects of task takeover: recovering relevant repository evidence and continuing from established conversational, tool, and file-work state. Comparisons across six receiving models show that structured handoff state improves repository evidence recovery for every model and continuation performance for most models. The strongest receivers differ between the two tracks, showing that evidence-recovery rankings alone do not characterize performance when continuing from inherited state. By combining these comparisons with checks of subsequent responses and actions, HSC-Bench evaluates both access to prior evidence and adherence to established commitments and completed work. This provides a basis for selecting receiving models and assessing handoff representations according to the work that must be carried forward.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.36523 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.36523v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36523 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 279 words
Related coverage

Taking AI labs to task on gimmicky social benchmarks is fair game
LessWrong · Sep 6, 2026
Should we benchmark conceptual capabilities using judgment prediction tasks?
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 17, 2026

[AINews] Collusion.wiki: A second undisclosed OpenAI agent swarm incident...
Latent Space · Sep 5, 2026
Observe Before You Alert: Adaptive Driver Alerting with Vision-Language Models
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026