aiqbench analysis
This study benchmarks various optimization algorithms for solving inverse problems using differentiable physics simulators, addressing a critical bottleneck in scientific discovery and engineering design. By evaluating first-order, second-order, and global optimizers across 12 diverse physics domains, the work provides actionable insights for selecting efficient gradient-based methods in differentiable programming. These findings are essential for advancing the reliability and speed of AI-driven simulations in complex physical systems.
Benchmarking Optimizers to Solve Inverse Problems with Differentiable Physics Simulators
arXiv:2609.13819v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Solving inverse problems with differentiable physics simulators holds the potential to revolutionize scientific discovery and engineering design, as it enjoys both the strict physical correctness from rigorous numerical physics simulators, and the high efficiency and effectiveness from automatic differentiation and gradient-based optimization. However, currently, this paradigm faces performance issues in optimization. In this work, we target benchmarking the performance of different optimizers to solve various inverse problems. We construct 12 differentiable physics simulators spanning physics domains including discrete mechanics, continuous mechanics, atomistic simulations, rendering, and semi-empirical physics models. Based on these simulators, we design corresponding inverse problems that can be categorized into parameter identification, inverse design, and optimal control. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to compare the performance of different optimizers, including regular first-order methods, approximate second-order methods, as well as global optimizers, on these inverse problems, and analyze the results to provide insights on how to choose and design optimizers for differentiable programming. We hope such benchmarks can inspire the development of more effective optimizers, and further promote the applications of differentiable programming in various scientific and engineering domains.
Abstract:Solving inverse problems with differentiable physics simulators holds the potential to revolutionize scientific discovery and engineering design, as it enjoys both the strict physical correctness from rigorous numerical physics simulators, and the high efficiency and effectiveness from automatic differentiation and gradient-based optimization. However, currently, this paradigm faces performance issues in optimization. In this work, we target benchmarking the performance of different optimizers to solve various inverse problems. We construct 12 differentiable physics simulators spanning physics domains including discrete mechanics, continuous mechanics, atomistic simulations, rendering, and semi-empirical physics models. Based on these simulators, we design corresponding inverse problems that can be categorized into parameter identification, inverse design, and optimal control. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments to compare the performance of different optimizers, including regular first-order methods, approximate second-order methods, as well as global optimizers, on these inverse problems, and analyze the results to provide insights on how to choose and design optimizers for differentiable programming. We hope such benchmarks can inspire the development of more effective optimizers, and further promote the applications of differentiable programming in various scientific and engineering domains.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph)
arXiv:2609.13819 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.13819v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.13819 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words
Related coverage
Adjoint Method versus Physics-Informed Neural Networks in PDE-Constrained Inverse Problems
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
Adjoint Method versus Physics-Informed Neural Networks in PDE-Constrained Inverse Problems
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026
IGA-KAN: Isogeometric Analysis with Physics-Informed Closed-Form Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks for Forward and Inverse PDEs
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026