aiqbench analysis
This benchmark tests a one-dimensional Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Method for advection-diffusion on three IBM quantum processors, which makes it a useful reality check on fluid-dynamics algorithms that have so far mostly been run on simulators. The authors find that the collision and streaming operators dominate gate count and depth, so they are the main obstacle to scaling on NISQ hardware. Their sampler-based density reconstruction cuts measurement overhead, though the work is a limited-scale assessment rather than evidence of practical advantage over classical CFD.
Benchmarking One-Dimensional Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Methods on Quantum Hardware
arXiv:2610.40851v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods encounter significant computational bottlenecks in large systems and at high Reynolds number flows due to the rapid increase in degrees of freedom, even on flagship supercomputers. As quantum computers emerge, the Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Method (QLBM) has been proposed as a quantum-native alternative for solving fluid dynamics problems. However, until recently, nearly all studies have relied on classical quantum simulators rather than real quantum hardware. This study presents a benchmark of a one-dimensional QLBM implementation executed on three different IBM Quantum hardware. We design and test a quantum circuit for the advection-diffusion equation using amplitude encoding, a Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK)-type collision operator, and a streaming step with periodic boundary conditions. Our numerical experiments evaluate transpiled two-qubit gate count, total circuit depth, runtime, and accuracy metrics including maximum absolute error ($L_\infty$ norm) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). We find that the present collision and streaming operators dominate the overall cost and become the primary scalability bottleneck on current hardware. To mitigate the prohibitive cost of full quantum state tomography on hardware-based benchmarking exercises, we introduce a sampler-based measurement strategy that reconstructs macroscopic density fields directly from computational-basis measurements. This approach substantially reduces measurement overhead while preserving the expected advection-diffusion dynamics on hardware. These results provide a quantitative assessment of QLBM performance in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime and identify the principal algorithmic and experimental limitations that must be addressed for QLBM to become viable for fluid dynamics.
Abstract:Classical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods encounter significant computational bottlenecks in large systems and at high Reynolds number flows due to the rapid increase in degrees of freedom, even on flagship supercomputers. As quantum computers emerge, the Quantum Lattice Boltzmann Method (QLBM) has been proposed as a quantum-native alternative for solving fluid dynamics problems. However, until recently, nearly all studies have relied on classical quantum simulators rather than real quantum hardware. This study presents a benchmark of a one-dimensional QLBM implementation executed on three different IBM Quantum hardware. We design and test a quantum circuit for the advection-diffusion equation using amplitude encoding, a Bhatnagar-Gross-Krook (BGK)-type collision operator, and a streaming step with periodic boundary conditions. Our numerical experiments evaluate transpiled two-qubit gate count, total circuit depth, runtime, and accuracy metrics including maximum absolute error ($L_\infty$ norm) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). We find that the present collision and streaming operators dominate the overall cost and become the primary scalability bottleneck on current hardware. To mitigate the prohibitive cost of full quantum state tomography on hardware-based benchmarking exercises, we introduce a sampler-based measurement strategy that reconstructs macroscopic density fields directly from computational-basis measurements. This approach substantially reduces measurement overhead while preserving the expected advection-diffusion dynamics on hardware. These results provide a quantitative assessment of QLBM performance in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) regime and identify the principal algorithmic and experimental limitations that must be addressed for QLBM to become viable for fluid dynamics.
Computational Physics (physics.comp-ph); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn); Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
arXiv:2610.40851 [physics.comp-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.40851v1 [physics.comp-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40851 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 341 words