aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a rigorous mathematical framework for benchmarking indirect quantum control schemes using higher-order quantum operations and semidefinite programming. By separating fixed dynamics from controllable inputs, the study quantifies the performance limits of various strategies, such as unitary controls versus those with feed-forward, specifically in qubit-purification tasks. The work provides a systematic tool for evaluating the necessity of advanced control resources in near-term quantum experiments.
Benchmarking indirect quantum control schemes via higher-order quantum operations
arXiv:2609.18409v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Indirect quantum control aims to manipulate a target system through interventions on an auxiliary controller with which it interacts. We formulate finite-step indirect-control protocols using the language of higher-order quantum operations, representing admissible controller manipulations as deterministic superinstruments. This representation separates the uncontrolled but fixed dynamics from the controllable operations and allows the optimal control problem to be written as a semidefinite program for a chosen figure of merit. The resulting optimum gives an operational benchmark by providing the best performance achievable by a finite sequence of control operations, including protocols with classical or quantum feed-forward. More restricted and experimentally motivated control classes, such as independent unitary controls or memoryless quantum channels, can then be compared against this benchmark. We illustrate the framework with a two-step qubit-purification task, in which an initially mixed target qubit is steered toward a pure state through a fixed interaction with a controller qubit. The example shows regimes where simple unitary strategies saturate the higher-order benchmark, as well as regimes where they are provably suboptimal. This approach provides a systematic way to study the value of control resources in indirect quantum-control schemes.
Abstract:Indirect quantum control aims to manipulate a target system through interventions on an auxiliary controller with which it interacts. We formulate finite-step indirect-control protocols using the language of higher-order quantum operations, representing admissible controller manipulations as deterministic superinstruments. This representation separates the uncontrolled but fixed dynamics from the controllable operations and allows the optimal control problem to be written as a semidefinite program for a chosen figure of merit. The resulting optimum gives an operational benchmark by providing the best performance achievable by a finite sequence of control operations, including protocols with classical or quantum feed-forward. More restricted and experimentally motivated control classes, such as independent unitary controls or memoryless quantum channels, can then be compared against this benchmark. We illustrate the framework with a two-step qubit-purification task, in which an initially mixed target qubit is steered toward a pure state through a fixed interaction with a controller qubit. The example shows regimes where simple unitary strategies saturate the higher-order benchmark, as well as regimes where they are provably suboptimal. This approach provides a systematic way to study the value of control resources in indirect quantum-control schemes.
arXiv:2609.18409 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.18409v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18409 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 276 words
Related coverage

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · Sep 2, 2026

Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing Companies in 2026
The Quantum Insider · Jun 12, 2026