Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study establishes a standardized benchmarking framework for graph deep learning models used in predicting chemical toxicity, addressing critical inconsistencies in datasets and evaluation protocols within drug discovery. By systematically evaluating over 20 approaches under uniform conditions, the research provides a reproducible baseline that clarifies the current strengths and limitations of molecular graph representations. The release of this open-source tool is significant for advancing reliable AI-driven methods in reducing attrition during preclinical stages.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Benchmarking graph-based models for in-silico toxicity prediction in drug discovery

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.37555v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Drug discovery is a costly and high-risk process, where toxicity-related failures remain a major cause of attrition in both preclinical and clinical stages. As a result, accurate early prediction of chemical toxicity is essential to reduce downstream costs and improve compound prioritization. In this context, graph deep learning (GDL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for toxicity prediction, leveraging molecular graph representations to learn directly from chemical structure with improved expressivity over traditional approaches. Despite the growing number of proposed models, current literature-based comparisons are often difficult to interpret due to inconsistencies in datasets, preprocessing pipelines, and evaluation protocols. To address this limitation, we introduce a unified and standardized benchmarking framework for GDL-based toxicity prediction. We systematically evaluate more than 20 representative approaches under consistent experimental conditions and across multiple datasets and partitioning strategies, enabling a fair and reproducible comparison of model performance. In addition, we complement this empirical study with a structured literature analysis to contextualize existing methodological trends and performance claims. Our results provide a clearer and more reliable assessment of the current state of the field, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of existing graph-based approaches. To support transparency and reproducibility, we release our benchmarking framework as open-source software https://gitlab.citius.gal/noel.suarez/benchtox, allowing the community to evaluate and compare models under consistent conditions.

Abstract:Drug discovery is a costly and high-risk process, where toxicity-related failures remain a major cause of attrition in both preclinical and clinical stages. As a result, accurate early prediction of chemical toxicity is essential to reduce downstream costs and improve compound prioritization. In this context, graph deep learning (GDL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for toxicity prediction, leveraging molecular graph representations to learn directly from chemical structure with improved expressivity over traditional approaches. Despite the growing number of proposed models, current literature-based comparisons are often difficult to interpret due to inconsistencies in datasets, preprocessing pipelines, and evaluation protocols. To address this limitation, we introduce a unified and standardized benchmarking framework for GDL-based toxicity prediction. We systematically evaluate more than 20 representative approaches under consistent experimental conditions and across multiple datasets and partitioning strategies, enabling a fair and reproducible comparison of model performance. In addition, we complement this empirical study with a structured literature analysis to contextualize existing methodological trends and performance claims. Our results provide a clearer and more reliable assessment of the current state of the field, highlighting both the strengths and limitations of existing graph-based approaches. To support transparency and reproducibility, we release our benchmarking framework as open-source software this https URL, allowing the community to evaluate and compare models under consistent conditions.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Biomolecules (q-bio.BM); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)

arXiv:2609.37555 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.37555v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37555 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 315 words

Related coverage